[12/36] Add OC-080 and OC-090 task tracks - #46
Conversation
ae88021 to
25cd41e
Compare
7c7d3ba to
0038c19
Compare
25cd41e to
4f97e4b
Compare
0038c19 to
a4f17ca
Compare
4f97e4b to
d32476f
Compare
a4f17ca to
ba2aa43
Compare
d32476f to
8e2092e
Compare
ba2aa43 to
7b8fa8a
Compare
|
Verdict: approve. Docs only, internally consistent with the audit PR before it: OC-080's stated gap correctly restates the runtime-lifecycle limitation the code actually has, the OC-070 rewrite is coherent with its new dependencies, and numbering lines up across board, dependency map, prompts and README. The renamed "Remaining Gap Evidence" file-path pointers are asserted rather than verified in-diff but nothing contradicts them. |
|
Already addressed; no change is required on this planning branch. I verified the evidence paths rather than treating them as assertions:
The stale snippet link and open-gap wording are already corrected by PR #53, branch |
|
Re-review (whole-stack pass, per REVIEW_GUIDE.md) This is a docs-only task-track PR, so the ledger is the deliverable. Its central claim about OC-090 is wrong against the code already in its own ancestry.
Verdict: changes-needed. Correct the OC-090 row to done with a pointer to #38 ( |
|
Response to the second review: the stale OC-090 documentation was a valid finding. I corrected it on stack-tip rework PR #72 in b220ecb, rather than rewriting this historical planning branch. The OC-090 task now records PR #38 and commits The task board's OC-090 row is |
This is part 10 of 21 in a stack made with GitButler: