[01/36] Add OpenCollection agent plan - #35
Conversation
|
Reviewed the whole stack, leaving findings per PR. This one covers the plan doc. Verdict: approve with nits. The plan's factual claims spot-checked against main all held up (Item union, HttpClient.send, HttpRequest-only validation, OAuth2 always-bearer/always-S256, missing redirect/proxy/mTLS). Sequencing is coherent. Issues:
Deps: none added by this PR itself. See the budget point above for what the plan should require of the implementation PRs. |
…ship across implementation tracks
|
@APKiwi Addressed comment feedback.
I left the GitButler bundle and stack-footer mismatch unchanged because those are intentional/generated stack metadata concerns rather than plan-content defects. |
|
Stack-integrity correction after the full sequential audit: I moved the review-only dependency and ownership clarifications from 78e7526 to the stack-tip rework PR #72 as d6b3799. Commit 8b815fd removes them from this historical branch, so the feedback is preserved without carrying the PR #46 conflict through the stack. Verified final state:
|
Scope and stack-integrity note
This PR remains the OpenCollection agent-plan foundation. Review-only dependency and ownership clarifications were initially added here in 78e7526, but the 37-PR sequential composition audit proved that retaining them on the base branch creates a conflict at PR #46.
Those seven clarifications are preserved at the stack tip in PR #72 as d6b3799. Commit 8b815fd removes them from this historical branch, leaving this PR's implementation diff in its original scope.
Validation: