Queue 101: auto_covariance from IMUQuality - #280
Draft
jbrodovsky wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
…UQuality Placeholder so the PR has a diff. Replaced by the implementation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
v1/p-imu-quality-covmainWhy
Pulled ahead of PR 1 on purpose: fixing #266 means retuning the ESKF covariance constants, and this is the principled way to do it instead of hand-picking new golden numbers.
Acceptance criteria
auto_covariancederives P0 fromIMUQuality+ position/velocity uncertaintyIMUQualityaccessors rather than new tablesPart of #257
Branches off
main; independent of the spine.Queue:
docs/V1_QUEUE.md| Board: https://github.com/users/jbrodovsky/projects/7