Add target whitelist for gas fund operations#7
Open
gakarot-sbs wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds an approved target whitelist for gas fund integrations.
Background
ClaimPool currently allows GasManager to interact with external integrations through
useGasFund()anduseGasFundApprove().As the protocol evolves to support additional gas-fund use cases (yield deployment, protocol operations, automated treasury workflows, etc.), it is beneficial to explicitly restrict those interactions to approved integrations rather than allowing unrestricted target selection.
This change introduces a lightweight defense-in-depth control without altering the existing role model or execution flow.
Changes
approvedTargetsmapping.TargetWhitelistedevent.TargetNotWhitelistederror.setApprovedTarget()admin function.useGasFund()useGasFundApprove()Benefits
Design Considerations
This approach was selected because it introduces minimal complexity while preserving the current trust model:
The result is a small, self-contained improvement that strengthens execution boundaries without requiring architectural changes.