Superseded by #167: the same four-document change with a DCO sign-off - #166
Closed
iderex wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Superseded by #167: the same four-document change with a DCO sign-off#166iderex wants to merge 1 commit into
iderex wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…say it holds nothing LICENSE is on the default branch carrying AGPL-3.0, and three documents plus one triage paragraph still said in the present tense that this repository has no licence file. Each of the three resolved fine and read as current, so a reader who believed them concluded they may not reuse anything here, which is the opposite of the terms the tree carries. docs/operator-guide.md tells a downloader what terms the thing arrived under. docs/promotion.md says what the code carries out and keeps the hand-over of somebody else's work blocked on entry three of #46, which carries no answer. SECURITY.md keeps the licence out of the set of things that are vulnerabilities. The triage paragraph in docs/supply-chain.md says the file has since landed and names the commit, with the License, 0 heading and the quoted warning left as the run this document declares reported them. None of the four says the declaration is made. DeclaredLicence is still empty and the licence leg still reports that it was not asked, so each document that mentions it points at #47 instead. Refs #163
iderex
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refs #163
Why this is closed
The head here carries no
Signed-off-bytrailer, and the DCO gate refused it byname:
The repair is the same commit cherry-picked with the trailer onto a new branch,
because the alternative is rewriting a branch that has already been pushed. That
is #167, which carries the whole body this one had, the same four-file diff and
its own run of the checks.
This branch is left where it is rather than deleted. Nothing was lost, and
nothing here is waiting on anybody.
What it changed
LICENSEis on the default branch and carries AGPL-3.0. Three documents and onetriage paragraph still said, in the present tense, that this repository has no
licence file.
docs/operator-guide.md,docs/promotion.mdandSECURITY.mdsaywhat the tree holds instead, and the triage paragraph under
License, 0indocs/supply-chain.mdsays the file has since landed and names the commit, withthe heading and the quoted warning left as the run that document declares
reported them.
None of the four says the licence declaration is made.
DeclaredLicenceis stillempty and the licence leg still reports that it was not asked, so each document
that mentions it points at #47.
The evidence for all of that is in #167 rather than restated here, because two
copies of one transcript drift apart and a reader cannot tell which one was run.