Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 50 minutes and 32 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughDependency versions are bumped in both the root 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES (1)
204-11215:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorRegenerate THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES from the current lockfile.
The file still includes 75 package names that do not appear inpnpm-lock.yaml, so stale entries need to be removed.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES` around lines 204 - 11215, THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES is stale and contains packages not present in the current pnpm lockfile. Regenerate the notice content from the current lockfile output so only actually bundled dependencies remain, and remove obsolete entries from the existing generated list. Use the same generation flow/tooling that produced the notices originally so the package/license sections stay consistent with the current dependency graph.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Line 35: The `@types/node` dependency is pinned to version ^25.9.3, which
corresponds to Node.js v25, but the project's engines field specifies support
for Node.js ^20.6.0 || ^22 || ^24, creating a version mismatch. Update the
`@types/node` version specification in package.json to ^20 to align with the
minimum supported Node.js version (20.6.0) and ensure type definitions
accurately reflect the APIs available in all supported runtime versions.
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES`:
- Around line 204-11215: THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES is stale and contains packages not
present in the current pnpm lockfile. Regenerate the notice content from the
current lockfile output so only actually bundled dependencies remain, and remove
obsolete entries from the existing generated list. Use the same generation
flow/tooling that produced the notices originally so the package/license
sections stay consistent with the current dependency graph.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: fbfd65e5-8bde-4f76-809d-4b1fdd2e9298
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
THIRD-PARTY-NOTICESpackage.jsonpackages/pages/package.jsonpackages/pages/src/vite-plugin/build/build.ts
https://yext.atlassian.net/browse/VULN-44975?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiZWU1ODMyZWY4NzM1NGQwOThkMzdlMTdmZjkxNTk0ODYiLCJwIjoiaiJ9
Similar change to yext/js#152