Use web AI models as a local coding and research assistant.
Codey connects to AI chat websites you already use, such as DeepSeek, Qwen, Xiaomi MiMo, and GLM, or to a local OpenAI-compatible model, then gives them controlled local work loops: chat, research with evidence, read files, edit files, run tests, show diffs, review changes, and restore safely.
It is a local-first, low-cost AI coding and research workspace for people who want useful coding help without wiring paid model APIs into every project.
No API key is required for web providers. Log in to the web AI in Edge or Chrome, pick a local project folder, and start building. If you run LM Studio, Ollama, llama.cpp, or another OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, choose Local and enter its base URL/model once.
Version: 0.2.12
- Use web AI accounts you already have: DeepSeek, Qwen, Xiaomi MiMo, and GLM are supported.
- Research before building: click
Researchto let Codey search the web, open HTML/PDF sources, save evidence notes, visualize the local note/source graph, and produce a cited synthesis with counter-evidence, source quality, and search coverage. - Keep code local: models access only the project folder you choose.
- Carry research into projects: after research, choose a folder and Codey injects a bounded Research Brief with citations and limitations instead of the whole vault.
- Controlled tool loop: read, edit, test, diff, review, and restore.
- Optional local model:
Localconnects to an OpenAI-compatible endpoint with optional API key support. - Review after edits: one model can write while another reviews the final diff; if no second model is available, the writer can run a labelled self-review pass.
- Beginner-friendly by design: Git helps, but it is not required.
AI-assisted programming should not require expensive API credits or complicated setup.
Codey is an experiment in making AI coding more accessible:
- use browser-based AI models
- keep code on your own machine
- see exactly what changed
- restore changes when needed
- let beginners start before they understand Git
The goal is not magic. The goal is a small, usable bridge from idea to working code.
Access matters.
If AI programming only works well for people who can pay for expensive API usage, many beginners are locked out. Codey tries a simpler path: use the web AI access people already have, connect it carefully to local files, and make the edit/test/diff/restore loop understandable.
This is not about replacing professional tools. It is about making the first step into programming and creation cheaper, simpler, and more local.
- Use New Chat for normal conversation without granting access to a project
- Use
Researchfrom the composer context to search/read HTML and text PDFs, save notes, and produce a grounded synthesis with numbered citations, evidence snippets, counter-evidence, source quality, and search coverage - Turn a plain chat into a project task from the same conversation by choosing a folder from the composer context
- Turn research into implementation by choosing a folder after the synthesis; Codey carries only a bounded Research Brief into the Writer prompt
- Inspect a Research run through
Evidence,Sources,Graph, andNotesdrawer tabs instead of reading a flat receipt; PDF page locators and search coverage appear inside the existing evidence/source views - Save successful implementation and verification facts back into local research memory without copying source code into the vault
- Discuss, inspect, and edit inside one project conversation; files change only when requested
- Let the model read and modify files in a selected project folder
- Run allowed tests, builds, linters, and type checks, then feed results back to the model
- Show red/green diffs
- Show a compact task receipt after each run, such as
DONE · 2 files changed · checks passed · restore available - Restore snapshot changes without requiring Git
- Use Git when available, but not require it
- Retry with another model when one model fails
- Use already-open models as hidden advisors for chat, empty-project planning, and read-only project audits
- Use two open web models together: one writes, the other reviews; when no second model is available, use the writer model in a temporary self-review tab instead of skipping review entirely
- Use hidden task briefs so Writer and Reviewer share the same bounded intent
- Give Writer, hidden advisors, and Reviewer a bounded local Project Map before they inspect files
- Let the model request bounded lexical reference hints before changing a symbol
- Flag a newly introduced Python syntax error immediately after a successful replacement edit, without rolling back or pretending a check passed
- Continue long conversations quietly with an automatic factual summary and fresh model chat
- Reuse project commands that have already succeeded locally
- Remember recent successful changes only from verified local checks
- Resume the same chat after a Codey restart or model switch from one bounded factual handoff plus recent visible conversation context
- Continue follow-up Research or Project Hybrid work from the same bounded chat handoff, so prompts like "continue researching that plan" keep the prior context
- Keep non-Git diff and restore available across Codey restarts
- Recover changed composer controls through bounded local discovery or a healthy sibling model, then verify, promote, and roll back the local bundle
- Recover one bounded web-chat state rule from boolean-only evidence when a verified control bundle is not enough; Qwen uses a real stop-state transition and MiMo uses an explicit typing transition
- Hand an interrupted project Writer to a healthy sibling model from bounded local checkpoint facts, with at most two switches and no repeated uncertain submission to the failed model
- Keep a small local provider-health circuit so rate limits, login pages, and repeated structural failures do not keep receiving hidden work
- Repair broken provider adapter code in a sandboxed background worker when bounded control and Flow recovery are not enough, then verify the candidate with an isolated worker canary before enabling it
- Stop a running provider wait, review, recovery, or test command promptly
- Give longer timeouts to full verification suites while keeping quick commands bounded
- Preserve both the beginning and end of long command output
- Tell the model the exact next
read_fileJSON call when a large file read returns only one page - Suggest narrowing a literal grep when search results hit the match limit
- Fold obvious dependency stack frames from Python and Node command output so user-code failures survive the existing output budget
- Render assistant replies with quiet Markdown basics and copy buttons on code blocks, without syntax highlighting or new colors
- Recover the active run, approval, or teaching prompt after a UI reconnect
- Prevent uncertain provider submissions from being sent twice
- Record compact provider failure diagnostics for debugging web-page breakage
- Launch Edge by default, fall back to Chrome when needed, and keep the local HTTP UI available if the native WebView window cannot open
| Model | Status |
|---|---|
| DeepSeek Web | Tested |
| Xiaomi MiMo Chat | Tested |
| Qwen Studio | Tested |
| GLM | Tested |
| Local OpenAI-compatible | Optional; configure endpoint/model in Codey |
Codey uses browser automation, so websites may break after UI changes. The current design keeps provider-specific code isolated so those adapters can be repaired without changing the agent core.
If a provider page changes, Codey first attempts the bounded recovery above. When it still cannot identify a control safely, it pauses and asks you to click that control once. It stores only the latest verified control record, never the page DOM or your conversation, so the main workflow stays quiet.
Recovered controls are committed only after the original message is submitted once and a new answer is read. The first successful bundle remains provisional; the next natural success promotes it, while explicit repeated control failures restore the previous bundle. Normal healthy sends do not call sibling models.
The same recovery bundle can contain one bounded Flow Recipe made only from fixed boolean facts such as response stability and a verified stop-state transition. Recipes cannot contain selectors, JavaScript, URLs, arbitrary clicks, page text, or project data. Completion is never inferred from stable text alone. Qwen uses a real stop-state transition, MiMo uses an explicit typing transition, and GLM safely keeps its built-in behavior until it exposes equally reliable terminal evidence.
If a project Writer fails with an explicit provider-page error, Codey can move the unfinished task to a healthy sibling model. The new Writer starts a clean conversation and receives only the original task plus bounded local checkpoint facts such as changed-file hashes and still-valid checks. Provider health stores only counters, timestamps, and failure kinds; it never stores page text, URLs, prompts, source code, cookies, or chat content. Cooled-down providers receive one data-free canary only when they are about to handle real work again.
If a provider adapter itself breaks after a larger website change, Codey can
queue a background adapter self-repair. The repair path runs in a separate
Python process, asks a healthy helper model to modify only the broken provider's
adapter files in a temporary sandbox, validates the candidate with policy
checks, static checks, provider unit tests, and a neutral marker canary, then
loads the candidate only through a child Provider worker. The worker uses a
fresh background tab in the same logged-in Codey browser profile, so it does
not need to copy cookies or block your current task. Candidates start as
provisional, become active only after natural successes, and roll back after
repeated structural failures. Core files such as agent.py, task_runner.py,
tool_runtime.py, server.py, and the recovery/safety modules are not
self-modified by this v1.
Research is Codey's research work loop. It is not a separate app and it is not
automatic background browsing. You explicitly click the Research token in the
composer context when you want Codey to search, read sources, and write local
evidence notes.
The main screen stays the same:
Choose folder · Research · DeepSeek/Qwen/Local
Choose folderattaches the current chat to a project.Researchenables a research run for the current message.- The model token still chooses the active provider; choosing
Localopens the local endpoint configuration popover.
Research can use web providers or Local. Search, page opening, URL policy,
note writes, restore, and evidence checks are always local Codey tools. Models
do not get hidden network access. A final synthesis can cite only sources that
Codey actually opened in the run.
Provider fit matters for Research. MiMo remains supported for ordinary chat and
simpler tasks, but live Deep Research A/B probes show it is currently a poor fit
for the strict JSON-tool research loop: it may emit multiple or malformed JSON
tool calls and lose context after protocol repair. Prefer DeepSeek, Qwen, GLM,
or Local when you want evidence-backed research with source notes.
In 0.2.4, Research keeps an Evidence Ledger and applies a deterministic report quality gate before saving the final synthesis. The report must include:
ConclusionKey evidenceCounter-evidence / limitationsSource qualitySearch coverageSources
Numbered citations such as [1] must map to final URLs opened by Codey during
that run. Each cited source must also have at least one saved evidence snippet
copied from the opened page text. Search-result URLs do not count as evidence
until Codey opens them.
PDF is part of the same open_url source intake. There is no open_pdf tool,
PDF mode, or extra button. When a URL points to a text PDF, Codey reads bounded
pages by default, records page metadata in the Evidence Ledger, and lets the
report cite page-specific evidence such as [1 p.4]. That page citation passes
only if Codey actually read the page and saved a snippet from that page. Scanned,
oversized, or extraction-failing PDFs are neutral SKIPPED results and do not
become opened sources.
The validator accepts common report formatting such as 1. Conclusion,
一、结论, and source rows written as [1] [Title](https://...), but it does
not relax source provenance or snippet matching. Explicit URL citations must
still match pages Codey opened as final URLs. Bare site-domain mentions in
source-quality text are more natural: opening docs.python.org allows a
quality note to say python.org, while opening python.org does not let the
report claim docs.python.org.
When a result points to a source Codey cannot read, such as a scanned or very
large PDF, Research marks that tool result as SKIPPED instead of a hard
failure and continues with other readable sources. If a model writes a
paraphrased evidence excerpt for an opened page or PDF page, Codey replaces it
with an exact opened-source snippet and records the note with a warning.
The flow is:
Chat about an idea
-> click Research and ask the research question
-> Codey searches, opens pages, records evidence, and saves a cited synthesis
-> choose a folder
-> Codey injects a bounded Research Brief into the project Writer
-> successful implementation/verification can be remembered as project facts
The Research drawer has four lightweight tabs:
Evidence: claims, snippets, PDF page locators, counterpoints, quality warnings, and search coverageSources: citation map, source titles, final URLs, quality hints, and PDF pages read/truncation metadataGraph: an on-demand local graph of current research notes, source URLs, counterpoints, implementation links, and verification linksNotes: synthesis, note ids, source URLs, and restore state
Coverage stays as supporting audit detail inside Evidence, rather than a
first-level concept. Graph is a bounded read model for the current Research
run, not a new database or a full-vault knowledge map.
The vault is stored under Codey's local state directory and is implemented as Markdown notes plus a rebuildable SQLite FTS index. Project source code is not copied into the vault; implementation notes record what changed, why, what was checked, and which research synthesis or decision it relates to. The Project Writer receives a bounded brief with key conclusions, citation map, evidence items, counterpoints, and source-quality risks, not the whole vault.
Hidden MoA Advice
MoA (Mixture of Agents) is Codey's invisible advisory layer. It adds no button, mode, or dashboard. In New Chat, the selected owner model drafts first, up to two other open models privately critique or supplement it, and the owner produces the one answer you see. Empty or placeholder-only projects use the same owner-first pattern for planning. In an existing project, advisors instead perform bounded read-only audits before the Writer acts.
Advisors cannot edit files, run commands, request Shell approval, access anything outside the selected project, or read sensitive and excluded paths. Their reports are suggestions: the Writer must verify them against real files. Advisor failures quietly fall back to the owner model.
This hidden MoA layer is separate from the post-change second-model Diff Review described below. MoA helps before or during the owner's reasoning; Diff Review checks the actual final changes.
One AI model can write code, but it can also miss small mistakes. Two models make the loop steadier: one model focuses on building, and another model looks over the changed code like a second pair of eyes.
You do not need to learn a new mode. If you open two supported AI pages in the Codey browser, Codey can automatically use them together:
- The model you select in Codey is the writer.
- Another open supported model becomes the reviewer.
- The writer reads files, edits code, and runs tests.
- The reviewer does not touch your files. It reads the diff plus a short bounded impact map of changed symbols, likely callers, and related tests, then points out concrete problems.
- If the reviewer approves, Codey finishes.
- If the reviewer finds a real issue, Codey asks the writer to repair it once more.
The reviewer runs only after the selected model actually changes a file. Project questions and read-only analysis return the selected model's answer directly, without turning a conversation into a code review.
If no different reviewer model is available, Codey can still run a same-model self-review in a temporary fresh tab. This is not an independent second opinion, but it asks the writer model to inspect the final diff again with the same bounded Review prompt, Impact Map, Verification Map, and evidence. If that self-review also fails, Codey quietly keeps the single-model result.
In plain words: two different models are best, because it is like a second teacher checking the work. One model can still do a self-review, which is like asking the same teacher to read it again carefully. If review is unavailable, Codey falls back to the original result. No group chat, no extra switch, no new concepts on the main screen.
pip install -r requirements.txtpython -m codeyCodey opens a local UI at http://127.0.0.1:<port>/.
When Codey opens the selected AI website in a dedicated browser profile, log in manually once.
The browser profile is separate from your normal daily browser profile:
C:\Users\<you>\.codey\edge-profile
C:\Users\<you>\.codey\chrome-profile
You can leave that model browser window open. Restarting the Codey UI does not close it; the next run will quietly reconnect to the existing CDP browser and tab when possible.
Example:
Create a small Python snake game in one file. Make it runnable with python snake.py.
Codey will ask the web AI for structured tool calls, apply edits locally, and show what changed.
You can also start in New Chat with no project access, discuss a plan, then
click the composer project context (Choose folder) to attach that same chat to
a folder. If there is a draft in the composer, clicking the same context keeps
the draft and sends it after the folder is chosen. If you only want a general
conversation with no project access, keep using New Chat.
To research before coding, click the Research token in the same composer
context, then ask for the sources, comparison, market scan, API notes, or design
background you need. Codey writes local research notes and a cited synthesis
with evidence, counterpoints, source quality, and search coverage. When you
then choose a folder, the Writer receives a bounded Research Brief instead of
the whole vault.
To use a local model, select Local from the model menu. Codey opens a compact
configuration popover for the OpenAI-compatible base URL, model id, and optional
API key. Leaving the key blank keeps any saved key; entering a new key replaces
the saved key when you click Connect.
When a task finishes, Codey summarizes the local facts in one quiet line:
DONE · 2 files changed · checks passed · restore available View diff
View diff opens the right-side changes drawer for the detailed red/green diff.
Codey is not an unrestricted shell.
- File operations are limited to the selected project folder.
- Normal edits are shown as diffs.
- Snapshot restore works even without Git.
- Git integration is optional.
- Shell commands require approval; setup/install approvals show risk notes, pass read-only local setup facts back to the writer, and include guarded follow-up hints after approval.
- The UI keeps failure recovery simple:
ERROR · Could not send the message Retry.
You should still review diffs before trusting generated code.
Codey is designed to work before a beginner understands Git.
| Environment | Behavior |
|---|---|
| No Git installed | create/edit files, show red/green diffs, save local snapshots, restore changes |
| Git installed, not a repository | same local diff flow, with a path to initialize Git later |
| Git repository | full Git diff, commit workflow, stronger history and rollback |
Git is an upgrade path, not an entry requirement.
Codey has been tested repairing broken copies of itself using DeepSeek, MiMo, and Qwen.
Each model:
- ran failing tests,
- read Codey source files,
- edited the broken code,
- reran tests,
- reached a green state.
See BOOTSTRAP_PROOF.md.
The current release also includes TEST_REPORT.md, which records the latest single-model, two-model, MoA, and self-bootstrap smoke results.
This does not prove Codey will never break. It proves the core repair loop exists: when Codey breaks in a testable way, it can use connected web AI, local tools, diff, restore, and tests to help repair itself.
The real Edge UI flow can be replayed with a deterministic test provider. The test covers project selection, provider switching, SSE, file edits, test execution, review, task receipts, diff, and snapshot restore:
python -B tools/ui_e2e.py --artifacts .e2e-artifacts --jsonWith all four model pages logged in through Edge CDP, run the real-provider matrix below. Every result is independently checked with a functional assertion and unittest after the agent finishes:
python -B tools/live_smoke.py --provider all --case edit --port 9222 --max-turns 10 --jsonThe explicit MoA snake flow is kept under tests/ because it is a real smoke
test, not a general tool. It writes its checkpoints and timing log inside the
target project under .codey/smoke/moa-snake-flow:
python -B tests\moa_snake_flow.py --project E:\snake --reset --jsonGenerate a small program:
Write a complete classic Snake game in pygame as a single file snake.py.
The file must run with: python snake.py
Fix a bug:
There is a file buggy.py with a subtle bug. Read it, fix the bug,
write the corrected version back to buggy.py, then run the test.
You can also run Codey without the web control panel:
# Single chat message
python -m codey chat "Explain Python's GIL in one sentence"
# Use Qwen
python -m codey chat --provider qwen "Explain Python's GIL in one sentence"
# Run the agent directly
python -m codey agent --provider qwen --project E:\my-project --max-turns 10 "Fix the failing tests"
# Emit machine-readable JSONL events for scripts or CI wrappers
python -m codey agent --json --provider qwen --project E:\my-project "Fix the failing tests"UI / CLI
|
Server / Orchestrator
|
Agent Runtime -- JsonToolCodec
|
ChatProvider -- DeepSeekWebProvider
-- QwenWebProvider
-- MimoWebProvider
-- GlmWebProvider
-- LocalOpenAIProvider
|
Browser Session + provider DOM driver
agent.py only knows about ChatProvider, ProtocolCodec, and tool calls. Browser automation and website selectors live in provider-specific adapters.
codey/
agent.py provider-independent agent runtime
cancellation.py shared task-local cancellation and process cleanup
events.py structured run events and log rendering
text_budget.py bounded head-and-tail output clipping
bounded_scan.py shared bounded local file traversal
scan_report.py compact scan omission facts and coverage rendering
tool_runtime.py local tools and structured outcomes
execution_evidence.py bounded in-memory execution fact ledger
references.py bounded lexical reference hints
changed_symbols.py lexical changed-symbol extraction from visible diffs
project_map.py deterministic bounded project orientation
project_task_context.py project facts, map, checkpoint, and verification context
knowledge/ local Markdown vault, FTS index, restore, and Research Briefs
research/ Research runner, web search/open tools, evidence ledger, report quality gate
verification_map.py bounded review-time verification candidates
review_impact_map.py review-only changed-symbol caller/test hints
change_brief.py hidden task intent brief
review_coordinator.py bounded diff review lifecycle
task_runner.py task, conversation, review, and receipt orchestration
browser.py Chromium CDP connection helpers
browser_worker.py Playwright thread scheduler
changes.py Git and snapshot diff / restore support
local_store.py shared local data root and atomic JSON writes
project_facts.py facts verified by successful local runs
work_checkpoint.py durable facts for unfinished execution
conversation_store.py bounded factual conversation persistence
provider_profiles.json versioned selectors for supported model pages
provider_profiles.py validated profile loader
provider_discovery.py bounded DOM candidate discovery and scoring
provider_controls.py verified recovery, learning, and human teaching
provider_flow.py bounded boolean web-chat state rules
provider_revival.py atomic control bundles, promotion, and rollback
provider_submission.py shared one-shot remote submission boundary
provider_send_loop.py shared send-loop lifecycle helpers for web providers
provider_supervisor.py passive health circuit, Writer selection, and canary
adapter_overrides.py local adapter candidates, promotion, and rollback
adapter_repair.py sandboxed provider adapter repair runner
repair_policy.py strict adapter repair file and code policy
repair_sandbox.py temporary source copy for adapter repair
repair_journal.py bounded local adapter repair journal
self_repair.py deduplicated background repair queue
self_repair_worker.py repair subprocess entry point and helper selection
provider_worker.py parent-side isolated adapter worker wrapper
provider_worker_child.py child process adapter runner
profile_doctor.py one-shot sanitized candidate selection
deepseek.py DeepSeek page driver
mimo.py MiMo page driver
qwen.py Qwen page driver
glm.py GLM page driver
provider_diagnostics.py compact provider failure records
receipt.py task completion receipt builder
protocols/
json_codec.py JSON-only tool protocol
providers/
registry.py provider registry and sibling-tab borrowing
local_openai.py OpenAI-compatible local model provider
*_web.py provider adapters
server.py local HTTP + SSE transport and runtime state
web/
index.html single-file control panel
- Web AI pages can change and break automation.
- Model quality varies.
- Web models may produce verbose or imperfect code.
- Codey is a local developer tool, not a security sandbox.
- You still need to review changes before keeping them.
Codey is released under the GNU General Public License version 2 only
(GPL-2.0-only). See LICENSE.