chore(vendor): bump tinyflows to 4e2e042

[senamakel]

Summary

Gitlink only. Brings in tinyhumansai/tinyflows#75, which lets an agent node carry what the host's harness did inside it: the transcript rides AgentRunOutcome → NodeOutput → ExecutionStep, where a RunObserver receives it on on_step_finish.

Before it, a workflow run could be read as pass/fail and nothing more — the node's output said what came out, and nothing said what happened inside.

8f63a273 → 4e2e0426.

Does this break openhuman's own flows domain?

No. Everything in that PR is additive at the type level:

• new fields with Default/serde(default) on AgentRunOutcome, NodeOutput and ExecutionStep
• new constructors (AgentRunOutcome::limit_stop, ::paused) and a derived Default on ExecutionStep
• TranscriptEntry moved out of the store feature and re-exported, so store::types::TranscriptEntry still resolves

The one thing to know: a struct literal that names every field of ExecutionStep or AgentRunOutcome needs ..Default::default() added. Nothing in this repo does that today — I grepped — so this is a note for the future rather than a change needed here.

Verification

Rather than assert compatibility, I built the downstream consumer against it. opencompany links this vendored tinyflows through its [patch.crates-io] entry, and its suite is green on this exact gitlink:

cargo test --features openhuman   →  5101 passed, 0 failed

That covers the flows-adjacent surface opencompany exercises. tinyflows' own gates on the merged commit: --workspace tests 1126 / all-features 1159 / adaptive 278, clippy -D warnings on both feature sets, coverage above the repo's 90% line gate.

Why now

It unblocks the opencompany side of run observability, which needs the transcript to reach a RunObserver in order to render what each agent did.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Maintenance
  • Updated the bundled TinyFlows component to a newer version.
  • No user-facing features or behavior changes were introduced.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews. Please try again later.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4643f00d-f145-4214-a4ba-84b053646dbe

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9e8f152 and 048762c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• vendor/tinyflows

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The vendor/tinyflows submodule pointer was updated from commit 8f63a2734f13bb5b7b974615bb8d4abd2df57894 to commit 4e2e04267ae62f04a3f8faccaf0bdad9f17a9c05.

Changes

Tinyflows update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update submodule reference vendor/tinyflows	The submodule reference now points to commit 4e2e04267ae62f04a3f8faccaf0bdad9f17a9c05.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 04876

This is a localized vendor update with additive behavior and reported passing compatibility and upstream checks; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks.

Suggested reviewers: graycyrus

Poem

A rabbit checks the pointer bright,
Tinyflows hops to newer light.
One commit changed, the path stays clear,
No tangled carrots hiding here.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the vendored tinyflows dependency update.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Warning

Your free Security trial is over. An organization admin can activate billing to continue.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}