Skip to content

chore(acdm): walk back tracked .claude rules — dev-tooling out of public repo (ADR 017)#33

Open
tikankika wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/acdm-rule-walkback
Open

chore(acdm): walk back tracked .claude rules — dev-tooling out of public repo (ADR 017)#33
tikankika wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/acdm-rule-walkback

Conversation

@tikankika

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Reverses #30 per ACDM ADR 017 (decision B).

#30 tracked three .claude/rules files under a selective negation, on the rationale "repo-policy travels / read by repo-tooling". That rationale was wrong: the tooling that reads them (/publish-check, ACDM, Claude Code) is local and has the files regardless of git-tracking, and .claude/*.md are agent instructions, not contributor-facing policy.

This restores .claude/ to a wholesale gitignore (dev-tooling, out of the public artifact) and un-tracks the three files. Nothing sensitive was exposed (reviewed — no PII/paths/secrets); they remain in history but are gone from the repo going forward.

The public data-protection policy moves to SECURITY.md (human-facing) — handled separately.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Reverses PR #30. The three rules were tracked under a selective .claude/ negation on
the rationale "repo-policy travels / read by repo-tooling". ADR 017 corrects that: the
tooling that reads them is local (has the files regardless of git), and .claude/*.md are
agent instructions, not contributor-facing policy. So .claude/ is restored to a wholesale
gitignore (dev-tooling, out of the public artifact); the public data-protection policy
lives in SECURITY.md instead.

Nothing sensitive was exposed (the three files contained no PII/paths/secrets — reviewed);
they remain in history but are no longer in the repo going forward.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant