docs: add ADR-017 (track the three repo-policy rules)#32
Merged
Conversation
Documents why data-protection, internal-docs-boundary and publish-readiness are tracked in .claude/rules/ while the rest of .claude/ stays git-ignored: "protection travels with the repo" (inverse of ADR-015). Records the alternatives considered and that the three files were reviewed as public-safe (no PII, no real paths, no secrets) before tracking. First ADR physically in the repo; the historical set still lives in the internal docs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Documents the decision behind PR #30 — why
data-protection.md,internal-docs-boundary.mdandpublish-readiness.mdare tracked in.claude/rules/while the rest of.claude/stays git-ignored.Why now
The rule files were tracked in #30, but the rationale was never written down — so the decision read as "these are public and I don't know why". This ADR fixes that.
What it records
.gitignoreallowlist (fails closed); keep process rules,acdm.json,.mcp.json,CLAUDE.mdignored.First ADR physically in the repo (
docs/decisions/); the historical set still lives in the internal docs.🤖 Generated with Claude Code