Restructure .lattice/requirements per new lattice standard#11
Conversation
PR Summary by QodoRestructure .lattice requirements into epic-based standard
AI Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (15)
|
Code Review by Qodo
Context used✅ Compliance rules (platform):
17 rules 1. Broken design doc link
|
| @@ -105,5 +105,5 @@ A test names a prerequisite that does not exist in the file. | |||
| ## Links | |||
|
|
|||
| - Design: [flow-002-test-dependency-graph.md](../../.lattice/context/flow-002-test-dependency-graph.md) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1. Broken design doc link 🐞 Bug ⚙ Maintainability
flow-002-test-dependency-graph.md links its design doc via ../../.lattice/context/..., which resolves to a non-existent .lattice/.lattice/context/... path from within .lattice/requirements/features/. This breaks navigation to the design spec and makes the requirement doc harder to use/maintain.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
The FLOW-002 requirements doc links to its design doc using an incorrect relative path (`../../.lattice/context/...`) that effectively points to `.lattice/.lattice/context/...`.
## Issue Context
Other requirement docs in the same folder link to design docs using `../../context/...`, and the FLOW-002 design doc exists at `.lattice/context/flow-002-test-dependency-graph.md`.
## Fix Focus Areas
- .lattice/requirements/features/flow-002-test-dependency-graph.md[105-108]
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
Summary
.lattice/requirements/to match the updated lattice requirement standardTest plan