Skip to content

feat: update and fixes to rfcs part 1#162

Open
SWvheerden wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
sw_massive_edits
Open

feat: update and fixes to rfcs part 1#162
SWvheerden wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
sw_massive_edits

Conversation

@SWvheerden
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates and fixes to rfcs, part 1 of many,
This includes a new about explaing the process

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates various RFC documents to reflect architectural changes, including renaming the Digital Assets Network (DAN) to Ootle, updating Proof of Work algorithms, and adding an HTTP API specification. The review identified two issues: a typo in a percentage notation in the overview document and a missing space in a domain-separated hash description in the consensus document.

Comment thread src/RFC-0001_overview.md
Comment thread src/RFC-0120_Consensus.md
Comment thread src/RFC-0122_Burning.md
create utility tokens on a sidechain or in Tari's case the DAN. By not allowing funds to be moved back, the sidechain gains an auditable total utilitarian value
. Value speculation is largely removed as the sidechain will only ever be as valuable as value of coins burnet in the peg.
An excellent example of using burned coins is a [Perpetual One-way Peg](https://medium.com/@RubenSomsen/21-million-bitcoins-to-rule-all-sidechains-the-perpetual-one-way-peg-96cb2f8ac302). This allows users to
create utility tokens on a sidechain or, in Tari's case, the DAN. By not allowing funds to be moved back, the sidechain gains an auditable total utilitarian value. Value speculation is largely removed, as the sidechain will only ever be as valuable as the value of coins burned in the peg.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be 'the Ootle' instead of 'the DAN'?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants