Skip to content

add interview-3 solutions#1184

Open
nikhylw wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
nikhylw:master
Open

add interview-3 solutions#1184
nikhylw wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
nikhylw:master

Conversation

@nikhylw
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nikhylw nikhylw commented May 10, 2026

Solution 1 (k-diff pairs) - W3_interview_k-diff-pairs.py
Solution 2 (pascals) - W3_interview_pascals.py

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Interview Problem : Pascal's Triangle (W3_interview_pascals.py)

Strengths:

  • Clear, methodical approach with three distinct phases
  • Good use of descriptive comments
  • Clean variable naming
  • Correctly handles edge cases (numRows=1 works correctly)

Areas for Improvement:

  • The solution could be slightly more efficient by directly building rows instead of initializing with zeros and then overwriting. For example, directly pushing {1} for first row, then building subsequent rows by adding elements.
  • The comment "Insert 0s for all the rows in increasing order" is slightly misleading - you're not inserting zeros, you're creating rows of zeros.
  • Could add type hints for better code documentation (e.g., def generate(self, numRows: int) -> List[List[int]]:)

Minor Optimization Opportunity:
The reference solution is more space-efficient during construction as it builds rows incrementally. Your approach pre-allocates all rows with zeros, which is fine but slightly less elegant. However, both approaches have the same final space complexity.

VERDICT: PASS


Interview Problem: Pairs with K difference (W3_interview_k-diff-pairs.py)

Strengths:

  • Excellent single-pass solution that is more efficient than the reference
  • Clean, readable code with good variable naming
  • Correctly handles all edge cases including k=0
  • Good use of sets for tracking seen numbers and unique pairs
  • Well-commented with time/space complexity

Areas for Improvement:

  • The solution is already well-optimized. One minor consideration: for very large arrays with small k values, the approach is already near-optimal.
  • Could consider adding type hints for better code documentation (e.g., nums: List[int], k: int already has them, which is good)

The solution demonstrates a solid understanding of the problem and implements an efficient algorithm. The single-pass approach is superior to the reference solution's two-pass method.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants