Skip to content

Backtracking-1 Solution#1138

Open
indrasena483 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
indrasena483:master
Open

Backtracking-1 Solution#1138
indrasena483 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
indrasena483:master

Conversation

@indrasena483
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Combination Sum (Problem1.java)

Strengths:

  • Excellent implementation of the backtracking pattern with proper backtracking (path.remove)
  • More memory-efficient than the reference solution by avoiding unnecessary ArrayList copies
  • Clean code structure with clear comments explaining each step
  • Correct base case handling and recursion termination

Areas for Improvement:

  • The time complexity analysis could be more precise. The actual complexity is closer to O(n * 2^n) where n is the number of candidates, as each candidate can be chosen or not chosen at each step
  • Consider adding early termination optimization: if candidates are sorted, you could prune branches where remaining candidates are too large to contribute to the remaining target

Minor Note:

  • The comment "Time Complexity : O(2^(m+n))" is slightly imprecise. A more accurate representation would be O(n * 2^n) or O(2^n) where n is the number of candidates, as the target value primarily affects the depth of recursion rather than the branching factor

VERDICT: PASS


Operations and expressions (Problem2.java)

Strengths:

  • Clean backtracking implementation with proper action/recurse/backtrack pattern
  • Correct handling of multiplication precedence using the tail variable
  • Proper early termination for invalid numbers with leading zeros
  • Good use of StringBuilder for efficient string manipulation
  • Clear separation of base case and recursive logic

Areas for Improvement:

  • The comment "top level" is slightly misleading; it would be clearer to say "first number (no operator)" or "starting number"
  • Consider adding a brief comment explaining why we track the "tail" value (for handling multiplication precedence)
  • The solution could benefit from early pruning: if calc exceeds target significantly during addition/subtraction, we could potentially prune branches (though this requires careful handling due to multiplication)

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants