Skip to content

blockifier_reexecution: simplify README wording per Orwell style rules#14862

Open
dan-starkware wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/orwell-blockifier-reexecution-readme
Open

blockifier_reexecution: simplify README wording per Orwell style rules#14862
dan-starkware wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/orwell-blockifier-reexecution-readme

Conversation

@dan-starkware

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Prose-only edits to crates/blockifier_reexecution/README.md, applying Orwell's writing rules. No facts, numbers, or names changed.

  • Line 38: It is necessary to supply a RPC provider urlYou must supply a RPC provider url.
  • Line 75: passive → active should be runRun offline reexecution …; cut very from very long.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01GjrAzEXJmrgsDjg9YSA1c6


Generated by Claude Code

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Low Risk
Markdown-only edits to documentation; no runtime, security, or API impact.

Overview
Documentation-only updates to crates/blockifier_reexecution/README.md under RPC test and Offline Reexecution—no behavior, CLI, or code changes.

In the RPC test section, the requirement to provide an RPC URL is stated directly as “You must supply a RPC provider url” instead of the more formal “It is necessary to supply…” phrasing.

For offline reexecution, the instructions use an imperative (“Run offline reexecution in release mode”) rather than passive “should be run”, and “very long” is shortened to “long.”

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 07d4be5. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@reviewable-StarkWare

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This change is Reviewable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants