Skip to content

Don't hold the channel lock across c-ares calls - #325

Open
dimbleby wants to merge 1 commit into
saghul:masterfrom
dimbleby:lock-inversion
Open

Don't hold the channel lock across c-ares calls#325
dimbleby wants to merge 1 commit into
saghul:masterfrom
dimbleby:lock-inversion

Conversation

@dimbleby

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I do not love how complicated it is getting to avoid use-after-free and deadlock at shutdown etc; but I see no obvious simplification.


c-ares runs callbacks with its own channel lock held, and a callback may call back into the Channel from another thread. So holding the Python lock across a c-ares call can deadlock: a thread in wait() held the lock until the query queue drained, but draining it needed a callback which wanted the same lock.

Hold the lock only while reading self._channel, and count the calls in flight instead, so that the shutdown thread can wait for the channel to fall idle before destroying it. Calls and waits are counted separately because they have to be drained either side of the cancel: a call may still submit a query, whereas a wait only returns once the cancel has happened.

c-ares runs callbacks with its own channel lock held, and a callback may
call back into the Channel from another thread. So holding the Python
lock across a c-ares call can deadlock: a thread in wait() held the lock
until the query queue drained, but draining it needed a callback which
wanted the same lock.

Hold the lock only while reading self._channel, and count the calls in
flight instead, so that the shutdown thread can wait for the channel to
fall idle before destroying it. Calls and waits are counted separately
because they have to be drained either side of the cancel: a call may
still submit a query, whereas a wait only returns once the cancel has
happened.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant