-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.5k
Merge compiletest directives to do with llvm versions #160637
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
aba39d9
bd85f93
10fc32b
541cb56
968a931
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ use semver::Version; | |
| use crate::common::{Config, Debugger, TestMode}; | ||
| use crate::directives::{ | ||
| self, AuxProps, DIRECTIVE_HANDLERS_MAP, DirectivesCache, EarlyProps, Edition, EditionRange, | ||
| FileDirectives, KNOWN_DIRECTIVE_NAMES_SET, LineNumber, extract_llvm_version, | ||
| extract_version_range, line_directive, parse_edition, parse_normalize_rule, | ||
| FileDirectives, KNOWN_DIRECTIVE_NAMES_SET, LineNumber, extract_llvm_version, line_directive, | ||
| parse_edition, parse_normalize_rule, | ||
| }; | ||
| use crate::executor::{CollectedTestDesc, ShouldFail, TestVariant}; | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -319,52 +319,52 @@ fn revisions() { | |
| #[test] | ||
| fn llvm_version() { | ||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("8.1.2").build(); | ||
| assert!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ min-llvm-version: 9.0")); | ||
| assert!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ llvm-version: >=9.0")); | ||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("9.0.1").build(); | ||
| assert!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ min-llvm-version: 9.2")); | ||
| assert!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ llvm-version: >=9.2")); | ||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("9.3.1").build(); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ min-llvm-version: 9.2")); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ llvm-version: >=9.2")); | ||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("10.0.0").build(); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ min-llvm-version: 9.0")); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ llvm-version: >=9.0")); | ||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("10.0.0").build(); | ||
| assert!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ exact-llvm-major-version: 9.0")); | ||
| assert!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ llvm-version: =9")); | ||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("9.0.0").build(); | ||
| assert!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ exact-llvm-major-version: 10.0")); | ||
| assert!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ llvm-version: =10.0")); | ||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("10.0.0").build(); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ exact-llvm-major-version: 10.0")); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ llvm-version: =10.0")); | ||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("10.0.0").build(); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ exact-llvm-major-version: 10")); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ llvm-version: =10")); | ||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("10.6.2").build(); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ exact-llvm-major-version: 10")); | ||
|
Comment on lines
345
to
346
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Question: wait, does this test case actually still pass...? |
||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("19.0.0").build(); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ max-llvm-major-version: 19")); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ llvm-version: <=19")); | ||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("19.1.2").build(); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ max-llvm-major-version: 19")); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ llvm-version: <=19")); | ||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("20.0.0").build(); | ||
| assert!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ max-llvm-major-version: 19")); | ||
| assert!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ llvm-version: <=19")); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[test] | ||
| fn system_llvm_version() { | ||
| let config: Config = cfg().system_llvm(true).llvm_version("17.0.0").build(); | ||
| assert!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ min-system-llvm-version: 18.0")); | ||
| assert!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ system-llvm-version: >=18")); | ||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().system_llvm(true).llvm_version("18.0.0").build(); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ min-system-llvm-version: 18.0")); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ system-llvm-version: >=18")); | ||
|
|
||
| let config: Config = cfg().llvm_version("17.0.0").build(); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ min-system-llvm-version: 18.0")); | ||
| assert!(!check_ignore(&config, "//@ system-llvm-version: >=18")); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[test] | ||
|
|
@@ -533,26 +533,35 @@ fn channel() { | |
|
|
||
| #[test] | ||
| fn test_extract_llvm_version() { | ||
| // Note: officially, semver *requires* that versions at the minimum have all three | ||
| // `major.minor.patch` numbers, though for test-writer's convenience we allow omitting the minor | ||
| // and patch numbers (which will be stubbed out as 0). | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("0"), Version::new(0, 0, 0)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("0.0"), Version::new(0, 0, 0)); | ||
| fn version_with_pre(major: u64, minor: u64, patch: u64, pre: &str) -> Version { | ||
| Version { | ||
| major, | ||
| minor, | ||
| patch, | ||
| pre: semver::Prerelease::new(pre).unwrap(), | ||
| build: semver::BuildMetadata::EMPTY, | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("0.0.0"), Version::new(0, 0, 0)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("1"), Version::new(1, 0, 0)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("1.2"), Version::new(1, 2, 0)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("1.2.3"), Version::new(1, 2, 3)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("4.5.6git"), Version::new(4, 5, 6)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("4.5.6-rc1"), Version::new(4, 5, 6)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("123.456.789-rc1"), Version::new(123, 456, 789)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("8.1.2-rust"), Version::new(8, 1, 2)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("9.0.1-rust-1.43.0-dev"), Version::new(9, 0, 1)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("9.3.1-rust-1.43.0-dev"), Version::new(9, 3, 1)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("10.0.0-rust"), Version::new(10, 0, 0)); | ||
| // assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("4.5.6git"), Version::new(4, 5, 6)); | ||
|
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is this an actual version string that llvm outputs? In that case I'll have to (partially?) revert the change to
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't think so, this was probably just trying to hedge against trailing random things
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Unfortunately I take that back, I believe for certain LLVM builds, the version string can actually be |
||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("4.5.6-rc1"), version_with_pre(4, 5, 6, "rc1")); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("123.456.789-rc1"), version_with_pre(123, 456, 789, "rc1")); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("8.1.2-rust"), version_with_pre(8, 1, 2, "rust")); | ||
| assert_eq!( | ||
| extract_llvm_version("9.0.1-rust-1.43.0-dev"), | ||
| version_with_pre(9, 0, 1, "rust-1.43.0-dev") | ||
| ); | ||
| assert_eq!( | ||
| extract_llvm_version("9.3.1-rust-1.43.0-dev"), | ||
| version_with_pre(9, 3, 1, "rust-1.43.0-dev") | ||
| ); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("10.0.0-rust"), version_with_pre(10, 0, 0, "rust")); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("11.1.0"), Version::new(11, 1, 0)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("12.0.0libcxx"), Version::new(12, 0, 0)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("12.0.0-rc3"), Version::new(12, 0, 0)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("13.0.0git"), Version::new(13, 0, 0)); | ||
| // assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("12.0.0libcxx"), Version::new(12, 0, 0)); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("12.0.0-rc3"), version_with_pre(12, 0, 0, "rc3")); | ||
| // assert_eq!(extract_llvm_version("13.0.0git"), Version::new(13, 0, 0)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[test] | ||
|
|
@@ -573,27 +582,6 @@ fn test_llvm_version_too_many_components() { | |
| extract_llvm_version("4.5.6.7"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[test] | ||
| fn test_extract_version_range() { | ||
| let wrapped_extract = |s: &str| Some(extract_llvm_version(s)); | ||
|
|
||
| assert_eq!( | ||
| extract_version_range("1.2.3 - 4.5.6", wrapped_extract), | ||
| Some((Version::new(1, 2, 3), Version::new(4, 5, 6))) | ||
| ); | ||
| assert_eq!( | ||
| extract_version_range("0 - 4.5.6", wrapped_extract), | ||
| Some((Version::new(0, 0, 0), Version::new(4, 5, 6))) | ||
| ); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_version_range("1.2.3 -", wrapped_extract), None); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_version_range("1.2.3 - ", wrapped_extract), None); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_version_range("- 4.5.6", wrapped_extract), None); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_version_range("-", wrapped_extract), None); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_version_range(" - 4.5.6", wrapped_extract), None); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_version_range(" - 4.5.6", wrapped_extract), None); | ||
| assert_eq!(extract_version_range("0 -", wrapped_extract), None); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[test] | ||
| #[should_panic(expected = "duplicate revision: `rpass1` in line ` rpass1 rpass1`")] | ||
| fn test_duplicate_revisions() { | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Discussion (not necessarily for this PR, but): hm, right now,
//@ editionuses the range literal format (e.g.2015..2021. I think>et al. are entirely reasonable for//@ llvm-versionor//@ system-llvm-version, just thateditionwould be a different syntax.I almost wonder if we should just, change
//@ editionto use>/</<=/>=? Foredition, at the time it was added, there was just a need for a syntax, not necessarily married to../..=.View changes since the review