Skip to content

Point MSP evaluators at the v6.4.1 provider bundle - #1952

Open
rcourtman wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/msp-doc-pin-v641
Open

Point MSP evaluators at the v6.4.1 provider bundle#1952
rcourtman wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/msp-doc-pin-v641

Conversation

@rcourtman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

docs/MSP.md (and its shipped mirror) pinned self-service MSP evaluation to the v6.2.1 bundle since 2026-08-11, while v6.3.2 and v6.4.1 both publish the signed provider archive with checksum and SSH signature under the same pulse-installer key.

The first external evaluation (2026-08-26, Seeweb-hosted, anonymous) followed those instructions exactly, so its licence request carried only the signing key: the v6.2.1 setup.sh predates the setup_stage and signup_source fields and the server defaulted both, bypassing the attribution the 2026-08-11 change introduced.

This pins v6.4.1, describes what that bundle's setup.sh sends, and documents the existing PULSE_PROVIDER_MSP_EVAL_EMAIL switch. Docs only. Built from origin/main with git plumbing (shared sidecar), so local hooks did not run; CI is the gate.

docs/MSP.md has pinned the self-service evaluation to the v6.2.1
bundle since 2026-08-11, while v6.3.2 and v6.4.1 both publish the
signed provider archive. The first external evaluation, on 2026-08-26,
followed those instructions exactly: its licence request carried only
the signing key, because the v6.2.1 setup.sh predates the setup_stage
and signup_source fields, so the server had to default the attribution
that the 2026-08-11 change was meant to capture. Pin v6.4.1, describe
what its setup.sh actually sends, and document the existing
PULSE_PROVIDER_MSP_EVAL_EMAIL switch so an evaluator can choose to be
contactable. The shipped copy under frontend-modern/public/docs is the
same blob, as the docs mirror check requires.
@rcourtman
rcourtman enabled auto-merge September 7, 2026 10:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant