Skip to content

feat(lab4): juice-shop SBOM + Grype/Trivy comparison + sign-ready att… #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
raylduk8 wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat(lab4): juice-shop SBOM + Grype/Trivy comparison + sign-ready att… #4

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions labs/lab4/juice-shop.cdx.json
View file
Open in desktop

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions labs/lab4/juice-shop.spdx.json
View file
Open in desktop

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

39 changes: 39 additions & 0 deletions submissions/lab4.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
# Lab 4 — Submission

## Task 1: Syft + Grype on Juice Shop

### SBOM stats
- `juice-shop.cdx.json` component count: 3069
- `juice-shop.cdx.json` size: 1.8M
- `juice-shop.spdx.json` component count: 909

### Grype severity breakdown (paste table or JSON)
| Severity | Count |
|----------|------:|
| Critical | 7 |
| High | 51 |
| Medium | 35 |
| Low | 4 |
| Negligible | 7 |
| **Total** | 104 |

### Top 10 CVEs (paste from jq output)
| CVE | Severity | Package | Installed | Fix |
|-----|----------|---------|-----------|-----|
| GHSA-c7hr-j4mj-j2w6 | Critical | jsonwebtoken | 0.1.0 | 4.2.2 |
| GHSA-c7hr-j4mj-j2w6 | Critical | jsonwebtoken | 0.4.0 | 4.2.2 |
| GHSA-jf85-cpcp-j695 | Critical | lodash | 2.4.2 | 4.17.12 |
| GHSA-xwcq-pm8m-c4vf | Critical | crypto-js | 3.3.0 | 4.2.0 |
| CVE-2026-5450 | Critical | libc6 | 2.41-12+deb13u2 | - |
| CVE-2026-34182 | Critical | libssl3t64 | 3.5.5-1~deb13u2 | 3.5.6-1~deb13u2 |
| GHSA-5mrr-rgp6-x4gr | Critical | marsdb | 0.6.11 | - |
| GHSA-35jh-r3h4-6jhm | High | lodash | 2.4.2 | 4.17.21 |
| GHSA-8hfj-j24r-96c4 | High | moment | 2.0.0 | 2.29.2 |
| GHSA-p6mc-m468-83gw | High | lodash.set | 4.3.2 | - |

### Fix-available rate
Out of the top 10 CVEs, how many have a fix available? What does that say about your
patch cadence priorities? (2-3 sentences. Reference Lecture 4's triage shortcut:
*sort by fix-available AND severity ≥ HIGH first*.)

7 out of 10 have a fix available. Priority should be given to fixing those vulnerabilities that are patchable and have a high or critical severity level. For all other vulnerabilities without a fix, the only option is to wait for an image update.