π‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) missing protection - #70
π‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) missing protection#70rauhmaru wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: rauhmaru <2289237+rauhmaru@users.noreply.github.com>
|
π Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a π emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
π¨ Severity: HIGH
π‘ Vulnerability: Missing Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection on forms.
π― Impact: Attackers could trick users into executing unwanted actions (e.g., deleting/modifying recipes or items) while authenticated.
π§ Fix: Initialized
Flask-WTF'sCSRFProtect, explicitly enabled it inapp.py, updated all POST forms in templates to pass the csrf token, disabled it for testing so APIs continue working and appended the learning insentinel.md.β Verification:
python -m pytestpasses all tests. Inspecting the forms source code shows<input type="hidden" name="csrf_token" ...>.PR created automatically by Jules for task 291809123836521150 started by @rauhmaru