Skip to content

Feature: docstrings check and suggestion #8

Merged
radetsky merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
feature/docstrings
Feb 6, 2026
Merged

Feature: docstrings check and suggestion #8
radetsky merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
feature/docstrings

Conversation

@radetsky

@radetsky radetsky commented Feb 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner
  • feature: offline mode only (static analysis + docstrings check)

Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions Bot Feb 6, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ LLM Code Review

Status: Passed

Category Count
Critical Issues 0
Warnings 3
Suggestions 1

Warnings

  • ⚠️ static_analyzer.py:147: stray string literal "line": current_line, causes a syntax error
  • ⚠️ static_analyzer.py:152: current_line += 1 is incorrectly placed; the line number increment logic is flawed
  • ⚠️ static_analyzer.py:156: added_lines dict construction likely omits the "line" field, so line numbers are missing in results

Suggestions

  • 💡 static_analyzer.py:147: remove the stray string literal and correctly assign "line": current_line within the dict that records added lines, and ensure current_line is incremented only after processing each added line.

Generated by LLM Code Review

Comment thread static_analyzer.py
elif line.startswith("@@"):
# Parse hunk header for new file line number
match = re.search(r"\+(\d+)", line)
if match:

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ stray string literal "line": current_line, causes a syntax error

Comment thread static_analyzer.py
elif line.startswith("+") and not line.startswith("+++"):
lines.append(
{
"content": line[1:], # Remove '+' prefix

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ current_line += 1 is incorrectly placed; the line number increment logic is flawed

Comment thread static_analyzer.py
"file": current_file,
"line": current_line,
}
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ added_lines dict construction likely omits the "line" field, so line numbers are missing in results

Comment thread static_analyzer.py
elif line.startswith("@@"):
# Parse hunk header for new file line number
match = re.search(r"\+(\d+)", line)
if match:

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 remove the stray string literal and correctly assign "line": current_line within the dict that records added lines, and ensure current_line is incremented only after processing each added line.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LLM Code Review found 3 warning(s).

@radetsky radetsky merged commit 840dece into main Feb 6, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant