Centralize sensitive log redaction across services - #308
Open
quarj0 wants to merge 33 commits into
Open
Conversation
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #150
Summary
safeLogand rejects direct productionconsole.*calls in lintVerification
DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=config.settings.testing uv run --project backend python backend/django/manage.py test commoncd backend/ai-service && uv run --project .. pytest tests/test_safe_logging.pycd frontend && pnpm --filter @identitycore/api-client lintSecurity notes
LogRecordcreation boundary so callers cannot bypass redaction by usinglogger.exception(...)or passing an exception as a formatting argument