Skip to content

[limen HEAL-cifix-organvm-call-function--ontological-10] fix failing CI on organvm/call-function--ontological#10#16

Open
4444J99 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
limen/heal-cifix-organvm-call-function--ontological-10-5fc8
Open

[limen HEAL-cifix-organvm-call-function--ontological-10] fix failing CI on organvm/call-function--ontological#10#16
4444J99 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
limen/heal-cifix-organvm-call-function--ontological-10-5fc8

Conversation

@4444J99

@4444J99 4444J99 commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Autonomous limen dispatch of task HEAL-cifix-organvm-call-function--ontological-10.

PR #10 has FAILING CI checks and merge-drain correctly refuses to merge it. Check out the PR branch, find the root cause of the red checks (lint / types / failing test / config), fix it, push to the SAME PR branch, and confirm every check goes green. Do not open a new PR — repair the existing one so merge-drain lands it. PR: #10 [auto-emitted 2026-07-03 by self-heal so merge-drain can land it]

Refs: #10

Produced in an isolated worktree off origin — review before merge.

limen task HEAL-cifix-organvm-call-function--ontological-10
@4444J99
4444J99 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 4, 2026 07:45

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2dbbf425f6

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread logs/agents/opencode.json
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
{

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Do not add unexempted agent logs

This new logs/agents/opencode.json file makes the validation workflow stay red: .github/workflows/validate.yml runs make validate-naming, which scans the repo root, and logs is not excluded in tools/validate_naming.py. I ran python tools/validate_naming.py --root . and it fails on this file because opencode.json does not match the required {Layer}.{Role}.{Domain}.{Extension} pattern, so this CI-repair commit still blocks PR validation.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@4444J99

4444J99 commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Disposition: superseded:https://github.com/organvm/call-function--ontological/pull/10.

I did not merge this branch. Verification found the branch only adds logs/agents/opencode.json; local python3 -m pytest -q and make validate pass, but make validate-naming fails because logs/agents/opencode.json does not match the repo's {Layer}.{Role}.{Domain}.{Extension} convention, and the visible validate check is red. The original target (#10) is now green and merged as a810145972d1800c1d06ffa8426b51dc45c4e6c6, so this healing PR's intent is already satisfied on main; if this branch is kept alive, the smallest next step is to drop or relocate/rename the agent log so naming validation passes.

@4444J99 4444J99 added the lifecycle:blocked Fail-closed pending explicit lifecycle review label Jul 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lifecycle:blocked Fail-closed pending explicit lifecycle review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant