Added SROCC, SRCCL and AR5 WGII (parts A and B)

[pmarbaix]

Added SROCC, SRCCL and AR5 WGII (full report, parts A global and B regional). Thanks for all the work already done!

[rgieseke]

Thank you for contributing, will take a look later!

[rgieseke]

I pushed some changes to the doc creation process which should make it easier to review the changes. There were some warnings about fields from the BibTeX processing.

[pmarbaix]

Thanks for the improvements. Regarding the warning, do you mean things like (?):

Database file #1: ../srocc.bib
Warning--can't use both author and editor fields in IPCC_2019_SROCC

If so, I have the impression that these are already present in your repository, and I followed the same approach. For example, if I create your files with make -B(= Unconditionally make all targets), I get

Database file #1: ../ar6-wg-i.bib
Warning--can't use both author and editor fields in IPCC_2021_WGI

This is because the reference 'IPCC_2021_WGI' is of type @book, while this type does not allow the authors and editors field simultaneously. I do not know why it is so, and could not find a clear documentation about it. https://ctan.mc1.root.project-creative.net/info/bibtex/tamethebeast/ttb_en.pdf indicates that @book requires an author OR an editor, but does not say that both cannot be provided simultaneously. As far as I understand, the warning does not appear with @incollection.

I am not familiar with GitHub yet, so I apologise if I missed something, but this is all I understand so far.
If I understand what you mean / want and the problem itself, then we have two choices: either continuing to live with that warning (it is nothing severe and some software do use both authors and editors), or we have to change @book to something else for all reports. I hope that this helps.

[rgieseke]

Yeah, the warnings could be something to fix in general or maybe it's not possible. I spotted some in the new entries but haven't looked into it in detail.

One thing I saw while skimming was

R. (ed.) van Diemen. Annex i: Glossary. In P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.-O. Pörtner, D. C., P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M. Belkacemi, and J. and Malley, editors, Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, book section Annex I Glossary. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2019. 

in SRCCL. I think this should have IPCC as the author as van Diemen as the coordinating editor.

[pmarbaix]

in SRCCL. I think this should have IPCC as the author as van Diemen as the coordinating editor.

Right, I corrected this. It is sometimes hard to get the official bib reference for IPCC reports in BibTeX. I hope that it is now good enough for the pull, thanks again.
Philippe.

[rgieseke]

Thank you @pmarbaix! With the change in the sed command (see review comment) I can't build it locally on Linux. Can you confirm you are on Mac? I can also look into a solution that might work for both platforms (maybe with an environment variable or a check in the Makefile).

[pmarbaix]

I apologise for the change to the Makefile (sed). I did not want to push it on GitHub but apparently made a mistake. Indeed it is needed on Mac. Of course a solution that would check and work on both would be wonderful (if that is not too long as compared to the objective - getting refs for the IPCC reports). The simple solution would be to remove my changes on the Makefile, as these were not intentional.

[rgieseke]

Thank you! This builds now for me again locally. I'll review this and will then merge.

[rgieseke]

Sorry for not having yet reviewed this.
I guess this being somewhat large has led me to not knowing how long it will take to not starting ... 🙂

I'll split it up:

• Review SROCC
• Review SRCCL
• Review AR5 WGII (parts A and B)
• Review TAR WGII SPM
• Fix merge conflicts

[rgieseke]

I haven't had much downtime or long train rides to properly review this, so if anyone likes to help with that ...