Skip to content

fix: make it possible to use litestack in apps not using ActiveRecord#127

Open
asgerb wants to merge 1 commit into
oldmoe:masterfrom
asgerb:patch-1
Open

fix: make it possible to use litestack in apps not using ActiveRecord#127
asgerb wants to merge 1 commit into
oldmoe:masterfrom
asgerb:patch-1

Conversation

@asgerb

@asgerb asgerb commented Aug 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Yes I know this is probably really weird, but I have an app that's not using ActiveRecord, and I would like to use litecache and litejob in it.

I hope you will consider this small change. I'm happy to amend this PR with a test case, but might need some help/guidance on how I could set that up.

@asgerb asgerb changed the title fix: make it possible to use litestack in an app not using ActiveRecord fix: make it possible to use litestack in apps not using ActiveRecord Aug 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant