Feature: literate language mode and support for literate coffee-script - #125
Open
sjorek wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Feature: literate language mode and support for literate coffee-script#125sjorek wants to merge 1 commit into
sjorek wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
+1 |
|
It seems that this offsets code blocks with comments by one line compared to http://nevir.github.io/groc/cli.html as an example, where code will be lined up with the comment, I think this may be a simple parsing issue. |
Contributor
Author
|
This is a deliberate design decision and obviously a bad one. Look at this literate-coffescript-file (and it's source) to get an idea of why I did it: … without this behavior code and comments get to much out of sync. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.


… what should I say, here is support for literate coffee-script. If one digs deeper into this mode, you will recognize that code and comments have always separate segments. This is necessary, because large blocks of literate comments will certainly get out of sync with the code they precede. This solution prevents this by not having literate comments side-by-side with code. But of course, non-literate comments in code are processed as usual.
A live-example:
Any feedback, especially to the side-by-side related stuff is always welcome !
Cheers,
Stephan