Skip to content

docs: 사이트 카피 — 무인자 비교 '본인 포함 랜덤 최대 10명' 정합 (PR2) - #59

Merged
mindongdong merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/random-fanout-site
Jul 4, 2026
Merged

docs: 사이트 카피 — 무인자 비교 '본인 포함 랜덤 최대 10명' 정합 (PR2)#59
mindongdong merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/random-fanout-site

Conversation

@mindongdong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

요약

무인자 랜덤 선정 작업(docs/random-fanout-work-order.md §5)의 사이트 PR2. 봇 PR1 #58(본인 고정+랜덤 선정, /경험치 대상 지정)과 짝.

  • site/data/tutorial-steps.tsx 10번 화면 — 제목 "대상을 안 적으면, 본인 포함 랜덤 최대 10명과 비교해요" / 본문 공평성 기조(본인 항상 포함 + 랜덤 채움) + /경험치 레벨 Top 10 예외 명시. 명령 객체 리터럴(드리프트 가드 파싱 대상)은 무접촉.
  • site/components/TutorialDemos.tsx — TargetDemo "레벨 상위 최대 10명" → "본인 포함 랜덤 최대 10명".
  • site/data/commands.json — 아이템·유니온·스타포스·잠재 요약문 동일 기조 갱신(스타포스·잠재는 "키 등록자" 유지), 경험치 tip에 대상 지정(최대 5명, 대표 캐릭터만) 언급 추가.

/내캐릭터 카피는 스코프아웃(솔로 모드 무변경) 그대로 미접촉.

검증

  • uv run pytest tests/test_website_command_drift.py tests/test_guide.py -q — 10 passed
  • node site/scripts/check-command-drift.mjs — 16개 명령·6개 그룹, 튜토리얼 30개 명령 참조 OK
  • npm run build — Compiled successfully, static pages 8/8

머지 순서

사이트는 Vercel 자동배포 — 봇 PR1 #58 머지·배포와 순서를 맞춰 머지 (작업지시서 §6).

- 튜토리얼 10번 화면 제목·본문: 공평성 기조(본인 항상 포함 + 랜덤) + /경험치 Top 10 예외 명시
- TutorialDemos TargetDemo 라벨 동기
- commands.json: 아이템·유니온·스타포스·잠재 요약문 갱신(스타포스·잠재 '키 등록자' 유지),
  경험치 tip에 대상 지정(최대 5명, 대표 캐릭터만) 추가
- 봇 PR #58(select_with_self·/경험치 대상 지정)과 짝, 드리프트 가드·빌드 그린
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
maple-mate Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 4, 2026 5:18am

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@mindongdong, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 55 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7a8a0d93-ebed-4124-bb8f-eb56f7cf7244

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b178d4e and 701e303.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • site/components/TutorialDemos.tsx
  • site/data/commands.json
  • site/data/tutorial-steps.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/random-fanout-site

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@mindongdong
mindongdong merged commit 697723b into main Jul 4, 2026
6 checks passed
@mindongdong
mindongdong deleted the feat/random-fanout-site branch July 4, 2026 05:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant