-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
benchcheck: parse go test -json instead of scanning text #516
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
291c6b8
benchcheck: parse go test -json instead of scanning text
michelle-clayton-work 6141603
benchcheck: address PR review — robust line reading and stderr capture
michelle-clayton-work 9dcdffb
benchcheck: rename test const max to avoid shadowing predeclared iden…
michelle-clayton-work dceccb3
benchcheck workflow: split check and benchstat into separate steps
michelle-clayton-work File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make more sense to run
benchstatas part ofbenchcheck, avoiding some shuffling of data through bash (and through files)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Took another look into this and the pinned x/perf only exposes the deprecated benchstat library whose output differs from the cmd/benchstat CLI we use. Reproducing the current format in-process would mean coupling to benchstat's internals and I feel like that would be a lot of work for a smaller result so maybe I would lean towards keeping it as a CLI call
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not talking about it being in-process necessarily--the
benchchecktool could useos/exec. Maybe it's a wash, with the changes needed to do that. 🤷(If nobody will be attempting this sequence of commands locally, we also don't have that reason to try to make
benchcheckhandle more for them.)