Record successful assisted-authoring cohort - #124
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #123.
Publishes the terminal result of the fourth independently precommitted protocol-1.0.1 assisted-authoring cohort. The result is
criterion-metat 3/4 sessions: Claude Code, OpenCode, and Pi passed all six objective milestones; Codex passed five and failed assessment.No session was rerun or replaced. The first three cohorts are preserved byte-for-byte under their historical filenames. Public claims are limited to the simulated agent-product protocol and make no human-author or real-decision-quality claim.
Verification:
python -m pytest— 1,226 passedcriterion-met, 3/4