-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
fix(responses): convert unpaired tool results without leaking invalid envelopes #4059
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Platinum-Scripts
wants to merge
1
commit into
lidge-jun:dev
from
Platinum-Scripts:fix/missing-call-id-repair
+85
−23
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win
Assert the converted custom-tool output content.
This test accepts a successful upstream request without proving that
"x"was retained in user context. A regression that drops thecustom_tool_call_outputpayload would still pass. Assert the forwarded body contains"x"and does not contain"undefined".Proposed test update
expect(res.status).toBe(200); expect(bodies).toHaveLength(1); + expect(bodies[0]).toContain("x"); + expect(bodies[0]).not.toContain("undefined");As per coding guidelines: “A behavior change in src/ should come with a focused regression test near the existing tests for that subsystem.”
📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Sources: Coding guidelines, Path instructions