Skip to content

docs: archive six-item bug stack delivery proof - #4009

Merged
lidge-jun merged 1 commit into
devfrom
codex/bug6-01a07e9d-close
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

docs: archive six-item bug stack delivery proof#4009
lidge-jun merged 1 commit into
devfrom
codex/bug6-01a07e9d-close

Conversation

@lidge-jun

@lidge-jun lidge-jun commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Archive the completed six-item bug delivery after all five owned product PRs (#3986, #3991, #3992, #3993, #4002) merged into dev. #3965 had already landed. The terminal ledger records original dispositions, contributor credit, actual merge SHAs, failure/retry history and exact candidate-to-dev tree equality.

Only this unit's Markdown records move from devlog/_plan/260908_bug6_manual_stack to devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack, with a new final proof record. Product files remain identical to certified candidate 5d5d357 and landed dev 9ad218a.

Verification

  • Product evidence: full CI34198186409, attempt2, all26 named jobs and required execution steps; PR CI34198172044, attempt1, exact candidate head. Failed historical attempts are recorded, not treated as successes.
  • Independent source/security reviews and final ancestry review passed. The final product tree equals the fetched landed tree; all30 pre-existing user files retain their original bytes.
  • The integrated public docs tree was built remotely with frozen dependencies:425 pages and rendered recovery links/text checked. Synthetic dashboard evidence remains at the identical inspected subtree.
  • Local product tests, install, typecheck and build: NOT RUN, per owner instruction. Hooks disabled per Git invocation; pushed with --no-verify. This documentation-only PR's skipped product jobs are not execution evidence.
  • Closing record review, exact path/mode/blob delta, current metadata/CI and remote privacy scan are required before this archive lands. No release or deployment.

The previously verified cumulative dashboard image is included for context (synthetic settings; no UI change in this PR):

Delegation preset evidence

Checklist

  • Scope stays focused and avoids unrelated cleanup.
  • Docs or release notes were updated when needed.
  • Security-sensitive changes were reviewed for secrets, auth, and unsafe defaults.

Maintainer integration

The owner authorized completion and merge of this delivery. Acting as current maintainer lidge-jun, I choose MAINTAINERS.md's dev-only integration path for this evidence-only closing PR, subject to its exact-head checks and independent record review. This is not self-approval; outstanding maintainer objections remain blocking. Final post-merge proof checks that the only differences from the certified product candidate are this reviewed record delta.

Closing head: 660e0a77af3515817ec7131295f7b13a3056deff. Independent record review passed; the exact diff contains only19 old/new paths within this unit (nine old Markdown files removed, ten archived files added). Remote bun run privacy:scan on a clean checkout of that exact head passed with exit0. Closing CI34202550653 and metadata gates must pass before merge.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added historical delivery records covering completed integration work, verification results, CI outcomes, and final product-tree confirmation.
    • Added references to terminal evidence for completed compatibility, messaging, guidance, preset, credit, recovery, and integration phases.
    • Preserved delivery details, authorship, validation notes, and user-file integrity records.
  • Chores

    • Removed superseded planning documents after completion.
    • No product code or public API changes were included.

@lidge-jun
lidge-jun requested a review from Ingwannu as a code owner September 8, 2026 08:04
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-08T08:09:17.984677Z 660e0a7 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 8, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 32b688f5-972b-40f1-b5ce-db80fb1c53b1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ad218a and 660e0a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (12)
  • devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/000_plan.md
  • devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/010_go_compatibility.md
  • devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/020_xai_continuation.md
  • devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/030_v2_guidance.md
  • devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/040_v2_preset.md
  • devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/050_credit_alias.md
  • devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/060_credit_recovery.md
  • devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/070_integration.md
  • devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/071_delivery.md
  • devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/072_final_proof.md
  • devlog/_plan/260908_bug6_manual_stack/000_plan.md
  • devlog/_plan/260908_bug6_manual_stack/071_delivery.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • devlog/_plan/260908_bug6_manual_stack/071_delivery.md
  • devlog/_plan/260908_bug6_manual_stack/000_plan.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 8 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This documentation-only change archives the completed manual bug-stack delivery. It adds delivery and final-proof records, marks historical phase documents complete, records archive completion, and removes two superseded planning documents.

Changes

Manual stack archive

Layer / File(s) Summary
Delivery evidence records
devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/071_delivery.md (lines 1–33), devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/072_final_proof.md (lines 1–23)
Adds delivery ledgers and final proof for the merged PRs, CI results, bounded repairs, tree verification, issue disposition, file-integrity checks, and archive completion.
Historical phase markers
devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/010_go_compatibility.md, 020_xai_continuation.md, 030_v2_guidance.md, 040_v2_preset.md, 050_credit_alias.md, 060_credit_recovery.md, 070_integration.md (lines 3–4)
Marks each phase record as historical and complete, with references to 071_delivery.md and 072_final_proof.md.
Archive completion and plan removal
devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/000_plan.md (lines 1–18), devlog/_plan/260908_bug6_manual_stack/000_plan.md, devlog/_plan/260908_bug6_manual_stack/071_delivery.md
Adds the completed stack disposition and removes the superseded planning records from the plan directory.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 660e0

This change archives completed delivery records and marks their historical phases complete without changing product behavior, deployment configuration, or runtime code. It is ready to merge.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately summarizes the primary change: archiving the six-item bug stack documentation and delivery proof. It is concise, specific, and directly related to the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/bug6-01a07e9d-close

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Deterministic PR hygiene checks passed.

@lidge-jun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

리뷰 · 우선순위 59 / 80

이 PR은 제품 코드를 고치지 않습니다. 이미 dev에 들어간 여섯 항목 버그 스택(260908_bug6_manual_stack) 의 계획·검증 문서를 devlog/_plan/ 에서 devlog/_fin/ 으로 옮기고, 실제 랜딩 증명(072_final_proof.md)과 실패/재시도 장부(071_delivery.md)를 남기는 마감 기록입니다. 지금 로컬 dev HEAD는 9ad218a9bdd34ee33004c35706d78396bf02eef2(package.json 2.48.0)이고, 마지막 머지는 #4002 수동 리셋 쿨다운 복구입니다. 이 PR이 말하는 제품 트리 5fba579b0d10183e921657dbcf4edbd166c20ec7 는 그 HEAD의 HEAD^{tree} 와 같았습니다. 즉 “코드가 또 바뀐다”가 아니라 “이미 끝난 열차 서류를 _fin에 고정한다”입니다.

왜 지금 가치가 있냐면, 제품 쪽은 이미 #3986(Go residual) → #3991(xAI string child-result) → #3992(V2 guidance) → #3993(server-owned preset) → #4002(cooldown recovery) 가 bottom-up 으로 들어갔고, #3965 canonical alias 는 그보다 앞서 402be7c1f 로 들어가 있었습니다. 원본 #3838/#3944/#3951, 이슈 #3907/#3973, leftover #3995(이미 landed-via-maintainer) 도 닫힌 상태입니다. 그런데 _plan/260908_bug6_manual_stack/ 이 그대로 남아 있으면 “다음 층이 뭐지?”가 흐려집니다. A-stack #3718_fin으로 닫힌 것과 같은 패턴이고, types.ts/config.ts 분할과도 무관합니다. #3997/#3996 은 이 배달 밖이라고 본문이 분명히 적어 두었고, 스냅샷의 “다음 open nearby”와도 맞습니다.

기록 품질도 현재 HEAD와 맞습니다. 071 표의 실제 merge SHA(7b22237769ad218a9b)와 #3965 402be7c1f 는 전부 현재 dev ancestry 안이고, 072 의 tree equality 주장도 로컬에서 같았습니다. full CI 34198186409 attempt2 / PR CI 34198172044 / 실패 이력(privacy fixture, macOS home-guard, Windows restart-help, EPERM afterEach 등)을 “통과로 바꿔 쓰지 않고” 남긴 점도 감사에 도움이 됩니다. 로컬 product test/install/typecheck/build 는 NOT RUN 이라고 본문이 반복해서 말합니다. 문서 전용 PR이라 그 스킵을 “초록 실행”으로 읽으면 안 됩니다. 범위는 이 유닛 Markdown 19경로(+90/−91)뿐이고 런타임·테스트·릴리스는 건드리지 않습니다.

경로 devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/000_plan.md - fin 마커. 여섯 원천 → 배달 PR/처분 표가 HEAD 이야기와 같습니다.
경로 devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/071_delivery.md - 후보 head·실제 merge·CI run/attempt + 실패/재시도 장부. 제품 증거와 이 archive 자체의 NOT RUN 을 분리해 둔 점이 좋습니다.
경로 devlog/_fin/260908_bug6_manual_stack/072_final_proof.md - tree 5fba579b0… · ancestry · 원본 close · user-file SHA 보존. 로컬 HEAD tree와 일치함을 확인했습니다.
경로 devlog/_plan/260908_bug6_manual_stack/* 삭제/이동 - 현재 HEAD _plan 에 남아 있는 9개 파일을 _fin으로 옮기는 것이 핵심. _plan 잔여가 남으면 fin과 중복됩니다.
라인 072 “closing PR merge SHA는 이 커밋에 못 박는다” - 맞습니다. 머지 후 session receipt에서 record-only delta만 한 번 보면 됩니다.
라인 CI/gates - closing CI 34202550653 과 hygiene/enforce-target 이 아직 pending인 조각이 있었습니다. 문서 전용이라도 메타데이터 게이트는 초록 확인 후 머지하세요.

메인테이너의 판단이 필요한 지점

  • 이 archive를 #4002 직후 바로 _fin에 넣을지, 아니면 #3997/#3996/#4007 같은 인접 open을 먼저 보고 “bug6 완전 종료” 문구를 더 조심할지(본문은 이미 범위를 밖으로 밀어 둠)
  • fin에 CI run URL·실패 재시도 장부를 남기는 수준이 감사에 충분한지, 아니면 2.48.x 컷 체크리스트에 한 줄만 더 옮길지
  • 본문의 “MAINTAINERS.md dev-only integration / not self-approval” 경로를 이 문서 PR에도 그대로 쓸지(제품 PR과 같은 형식)

너의 추천
표의 merge SHA·tree·원본 close는 이미 현재 dev와 맞습니다. closing CI/hygiene가 초록이면 바로 dev에 머지하세요. 제품 회귀 없고, types/config 분할과도 무관하며, 닫거나 리베이스할 이유가 없습니다. 머지 후 _plan/260908_bug6_manual_stack/ 이 비었는지와 record-only delta만 확인하면 됩니다. #3995 leftover 위생은 이미 끝난 상태입니다.

이 댓글은 grok-bot이 작성했습니다

@lidge-jun
lidge-jun merged commit 7797586 into dev Sep 8, 2026
24 of 25 checks passed
@lidge-jun
lidge-jun deleted the codex/bug6-01a07e9d-close branch September 8, 2026 08:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant