Skip to content

PR-AUDIT · production audit 2026-04-25 — gap inventory G1..G8 - #33

Merged
lemone112 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
devin/1777080043-prod-audit
Apr 25, 2026
Merged

PR-AUDIT · production audit 2026-04-25 — gap inventory G1..G8#33
lemone112 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
devin/1777080043-prod-audit

Conversation

@devin-ai-integration

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot commented Apr 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Adds plan/spec/production-audit-2026-04-25.md — a comprehensive audit of @lab-ui/tokens@0.2.0 production output against SPEC v0.2.

Goal: identify all gaps blocking "tokens ready to connect to components" before user returns.

Findings

Gap Title Severity Action PR
G1 BG cells missing (--bg-inverted, --bg-grouped-*, --bg-overlay-{ghost,soft,strong}, --bg-static-dark) component-blocking PR-PROD1
G2 FX.Glow sentiment set wrong (Info+Success emitted, Neutral+Inverted missing) high PR-PROD2.A
G3 FX.Focus-ring not sentiment-split (single var; SPEC requires 4) high PR-PROD2.B
G4 FX.Skeleton not tier-split (single var; SPEC requires Base+Highlight) medium PR-PROD2.C
G5 SPEC §5.1 header count drift (35 vs body listing of ~17) low (docs) PR-SPEC-AUDIT
G6 SPEC §5.3 count check needed low (docs) PR-SPEC-AUDIT
G7 Tailwind preset coverage OK (snapshot guard) none
G8 Component scaffold absent downstream (not token-side) separate effort

No paradigm violations. All gaps are scope incompletions (missing SPEC-listed cells), not C-rule violations.

Audit details

  • Build: green (35.2ms)
  • Tests: 248 pass / 0 fail (4 snapshots, 1764 expect calls)
  • Total emitted CSS vars: 1137
  • File sizes: tokens.css 216KB, tailwind-preset.css 41KB, index.d.ts 46KB, index.js 55KB

Categorized var counts vs SPEC expectations included in the doc; sentiment coverage matrix highlights drift.

Action plan (subsequent PRs in this autonomous run)

  1. PR-PROD1 — Close BG gap (G1). 8 new BG vars, additive only.
  2. PR-PROD2 — FX corrections (G2, G3, G4). Grace period for Glow.Info/Success deprecation.
  3. PR-SPEC-AUDIT — Reconcile SPEC §5 count headers.
  4. PR-COMPONENT-MAP — Token → component slot mapping doc (after gaps close).

Review & Testing Checklist for Human

(Risk: green — markdown-only audit doc, no code changes.)

  • Spot-check 1–2 gaps against Figma fixture (plan/figma/tokens.json) to verify the gap is real, not invented.
  • Confirm the action plan ordering makes sense (BG before FX since FX depends on grace period more carefully).

Notes

This doc is meant to be read by both designer and Devin in subsequent sessions. It serves as a single-source-of-truth for "what's missing in v0.2.x production" and what's queued for v0.3.

Link to Devin session: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/b536bd94e35841f0be9bb93829697a46
Requested by: @lemone112


Open in Devin Review

Findings:
- BG gap (G1): 8 SPEC §5.1 cells missing (--bg-inverted, --bg-grouped-*,
  --bg-overlay-{ghost,soft,strong}, --bg-static-dark). Component-blocking.
- FX.Glow set wrong (G2): emits Info+Success which SPEC §5.5 forbids;
  missing Neutral+Inverted.
- FX.Focus-ring not split (G3): single var; SPEC requires 4 sentiment vars.
- FX.Skeleton not split (G4): single var; SPEC requires Base+Highlight.
- SPEC §5.1/§5.3 count drift (G5, G6): documentation-only.

Action plan: PR-PROD1 (BG), PR-PROD2 (FX), PR-SPEC-AUDIT (count drift),
PR-COMPONENT-MAP (integration guide).

No paradigm violations detected — all gaps are scope incompletions.

Co-Authored-By: jaquan_boyer84 <lemonesqeezy@gmail.com>
@devin-ai-integration

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

  • Address comments on this PR. Add '(aside)' to your comment to have me ignore it.
  • Look at CI failures and help fix them

Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository.

⚙️ Control Options:

  • Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no bugs or issues to report.

Open in Devin Review

@lemone112
lemone112 merged commit 2c1c640 into main Apr 25, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant