chore: upgrade Rolldown 1.0.1

[react-server-bot]

Automated daily upgrade of Vite, Rolldown, and/or Vitest to the latest available versions.

Rolldown: 1.0.0 → 1.0.1

Updated locations

• packages/react-server/package.json — vite, rolldown
• test/package.json — vite, rolldown, vitest, @vitest/ui
• packages/rsc/package.json — vitest, @vitest/*
• packages/create-react-server/test/package.json — vitest
• package.json — all pnpm.overrides for Vite
• pnpm-lock.yaml

Smoke test

• Dev mode — hello world test passed ✅
• Build+start mode — hello world test passed ✅

[github-actions]

⚡ Flight Protocol Benchmark

Commit: ebde941

Serialization (renderToReadableStream)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc	webpack	vs webpack
react: minimal element	218.0K	26.7K	🟢 +715.8%
react: shallow wide (1000)	2.2K	334	🟢 +556.0%
react: deep nested (100)	17.1K	5.8K	🟢 +197.2%
react: product list (50)	5.9K	1.9K	🟢 +207.1%
react: large table (500x10)	275	92	🟢 +198.9%
data: primitives	172.8K	38.5K	🟢 +348.7%
data: large string (100KB)	7.2K	6.8K	🟢 +6.2%
data: nested objects (20)	57.8K	25.4K	🟢 +128.0%
data: large array (10K)	114	114	⚪ -0.3%
data: Map & Set	10.5K	5.8K	🟢 +82.7%
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	163.0K	33.6K	🟢 +384.7%
data: typed arrays	32.9K	13.2K	🟢 +149.9%
data: mixed payload	8.1K	4.0K	🟢 +100.0%

Prerender (prerender)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc ops/s	mean
react: minimal element	238.3K	4.2 µs
react: shallow wide (1000)	2.0K	497.7 µs
react: deep nested (100)	15.7K	63.6 µs
react: product list (50)	5.7K	175.9 µs
react: large table (500x10)	272	3.67 ms
data: primitives	183.0K	5.5 µs
data: large string (100KB)	682	1.47 ms
data: nested objects (20)	59.1K	16.9 µs
data: large array (10K)	116	8.65 ms
data: Map & Set	11.1K	90.1 µs
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	186.3K	5.4 µs
data: typed arrays	667	1.50 ms
data: mixed payload	7.6K	132.4 µs

Deserialization (createFromReadableStream)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc	webpack	vs webpack
react: minimal element	166.8K	136.9K	🟢 +21.9%
react: shallow wide (1000)	23.0K	1.9K	🟢 +1081.4%
react: deep nested (100)	99.7K	19.0K	🟢 +425.6%
react: product list (50)	51.1K	14.3K	🟢 +257.2%
react: large table (500x10)	4.1K	2.0K	🟢 +101.6%
data: primitives	133.3K	127.9K	🟢 +4.2%
data: large string (100KB)	41.3K	31.8K	🟢 +29.8%
data: nested objects (20)	84.4K	67.7K	🟢 +24.7%
data: large array (10K)	281	257	🟢 +9.6%
data: Map & Set	16.2K	14.1K	🟢 +14.5%
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	135.6K	108.1K	🟢 +25.4%
data: typed arrays	54.7K	42.2K	🟢 +29.6%
data: mixed payload	25.5K	14.2K	🟢 +79.1%

Roundtrip (serialize + deserialize)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc	webpack	vs webpack
react: minimal element	101.8K	21.4K	🟢 +375.9%
react: shallow wide (1000)	1.7K	275	🟢 +528.5%
react: deep nested (100)	14.4K	4.2K	🟢 +246.6%
react: product list (50)	5.3K	1.6K	🟢 +230.9%
react: large table (500x10)	263	87	🟢 +204.1%
data: primitives	80.9K	27.8K	🟢 +191.0%
data: large string (100KB)	6.4K	6.4K	⚪ -0.2%
data: nested objects (20)	31.4K	16.8K	🟢 +86.5%
data: large array (10K)	79	75	🟢 +4.5%
data: Map & Set	6.1K	3.8K	🟢 +60.7%
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	66.9K	22.4K	🟢 +198.4%
data: typed arrays	23.5K	11.1K	🟢 +111.4%
data: mixed payload	5.8K	2.9K	🟢 +98.7%

Legend & methodology

Indicators: 🟢 > 1% faster | 🔴 > 1% slower | ⚪ within noise margin

vs webpack: compares @lazarv/rsc against react-server-dom-webpack within the same run.
vs baseline: compares @lazarv/rsc against the previous main branch run.

Values shown are operations/second (higher is better). Each scenario runs for at least 100 iterations with warmup.

Benchmarks run on GitHub Actions runners (shared infrastructure) — expect ~5% variance between runs. Consistent directional changes across multiple scenarios are more meaningful than any single number.

[codecov-commenter]

❌ 5 Tests Failed:

Tests completed	Failed	Passed	Skipped
1088	5	1083	3

View the top 3 failed test(s) by shortest run time

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: get-started > starts in production mode

Stack Traces | 0.000651s run time

AssertionError: production start should work: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:74:66

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: router > starts in production mode

Stack Traces | 0.000954s run time

AssertionError: production start should work: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:74:66

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: get-started > builds the app

Stack Traces | 0.000961s run time

AssertionError: build should succeed: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:70:58

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: router > builds the app

Stack Traces | 0.00107s run time

AssertionError: build should succeed: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:70:58

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: nextjs > starts in production mode

Stack Traces | 0.00121s run time

AssertionError: production start should work: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:74:66

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (npm) > preset: nextjs > starts in production mode

Stack Traces | 0.00175s run time

AssertionError: production start should work: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:74:66

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: get-started > dev mode starts and serves the app

Stack Traces | 0.00695s run time

AssertionError: dev mode should work: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:66:56

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (npm) > preset: nextjs > builds the app

Stack Traces | 0.00862s run time

AssertionError: build should succeed: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:70:58

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: nextjs > builds the app

Stack Traces | 0.0102s run time

AssertionError: build should succeed: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:70:58

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
_{📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.}

[github-actions]

⚡ Benchmark Results

	PR 3e67696	main 49ec76b
Config	50 connections, 10s/test	50 connections, 10s/test

Benchmark	Req/s	vs main	Avg Latency	vs main	P99 Latency	Throughput
minimal	1286	🟢 +3.8%	38.27 ms	🟢 -3.5%	75 ms	0.8 MB/s
small	1325	🟢 +6.0%	37.03 ms	🟢 -6.0%	67 ms	1.3 MB/s
medium	392	🟢 +5.0%	125.56 ms	🟢 -5.0%	175 ms	5.8 MB/s
large	48	🟢 +4.8%	1004.17 ms	🟢 -2.1%	2338 ms	4.8 MB/s
deep	829	🔴 -7.8%	59.63 ms	🔴 +9.0%	103 ms	2.8 MB/s
wide	70	🔴 -2.3%	705.1 ms	🔴 +2.8%	1391 ms	3.8 MB/s
cached	3464	🟢 +2.0%	13.88 ms	🟢 -2.5%	28 ms	50.9 MB/s
client-min	430	🔴 -3.9%	114.44 ms	🔴 +3.6%	187 ms	1.8 MB/s
client-small	453	🔴 -3.0%	108.44 ms	🔴 +2.3%	160 ms	2.1 MB/s
client-med	343	⚪ -0.6%	144.12 ms	⚪ +0.4%	210 ms	6.3 MB/s
client-large	81	🔴 -2.3%	600.8 ms	🔴 +1.0%	1164 ms	8.5 MB/s
client-deep	442	🟢 +1.2%	111.7 ms	🟢 -1.2%	167 ms	3.1 MB/s
client-wide	144	🟢 +1.5%	344.15 ms	🟢 -1.1%	655 ms	8.4 MB/s
rsc-client-large	1083	⚪ -0.4%	45.51 ms	⚪ +0.4%	67 ms	2.8 MB/s
rsc-client-wide	1114	🟢 +1.9%	44.2 ms	🟢 -1.9%	66 ms	2.8 MB/s
static-json	7092	🔴 -5.1%	6.59 ms	🔴 +7.9%	16 ms	3.0 MB/s
static-js	7310	🟢 +6.2%	6.41 ms	🟢 -5.9%	16 ms	9.2 MB/s
404-miss	4771	🟢 +1.4%	9.83 ms	🟢 -1.8%	22 ms	0.6 MB/s
hybrid-min	451	⚪ +0.2%	109.44 ms	⚪ +0.1%	161 ms	2.1 MB/s
hybrid-small	443	🟢 +2.3%	111.53 ms	🟢 -2.3%	161 ms	2.6 MB/s
hybrid-medium	239	🟢 +3.6%	206.96 ms	🟢 -2.6%	303 ms	10.2 MB/s
hybrid-large	41	🟢 +3.2%	1115.39 ms	🟢 -2.0%	1934 ms	13.2 MB/s
hybrid-deep	359	🟢 +1.3%	137.09 ms	🟢 -1.4%	182 ms	4.9 MB/s
hybrid-wide	61	⚪ +0.7%	787.23 ms	⚪ +0.8%	1090 ms	12.0 MB/s
hybrid-cached	2975	🟢 +3.8%	16.33 ms	🟢 -3.3%	32 ms	126.3 MB/s
hybrid-client-min	481	⚪ -0.4%	102.88 ms	⚪ +0.3%	150 ms	2.1 MB/s
hybrid-client-small	481	🔴 -1.4%	102.72 ms	🔴 +1.2%	153 ms	2.3 MB/s
hybrid-client-medium	361	⚪ +0.4%	136.63 ms	⚪ -0.4%	207 ms	6.7 MB/s
hybrid-client-large	83	🟢 +3.1%	589.38 ms	⚪ +0.8%	1163 ms	8.7 MB/s
hybrid-client-deep	443	🟢 +4.2%	111.74 ms	🟢 -3.5%	168 ms	3.2 MB/s
hybrid-client-wide	137	⚪ +0.5%	356.49 ms	⚪ +0.1%	651 ms	8.0 MB/s

Legend

🟢 > 1% improvement | 🔴 > 1% regression | ⚪ within noise margin

Benchmarks run on GitHub Actions runners (shared infrastructure) — expect ~5% variance between runs. Consistent directional changes across multiple routes are more meaningful than any single number.