Improve public landing page

[l2ktech]

Summary

• add the NotionNext public case-study overview link
• replace private workspace references with a sanitized public landing narrative
• add a Mermaid architecture diagram and public-safe next artifact list

Validation

• checked the NotionNext overview URL returns 200
• scanned README for private repo names, local paths, private network addresses, cookie/webhook/env/log/profile terms, and high-confidence secret patterns
• ran git diff --check

Summary by Sourcery

Refresh the public landing README to present the project as a portfolio-friendly, public-safe case study for an AI media and knowledge automation workflow.

Enhancements:

• Clarify the workflow stages to focus on reusable AI structuring and document sync rather than a specific private implementation.
• Add a high-level architecture flowchart to illustrate the end-to-end automation pipeline.
• Refine interview/portfolio positioning language to emphasize media and knowledge tasks and structured study outputs.
• Tighten the description of public/private boundaries to highlight that this repo is a sanitized landing pointer only.
• Update the list of planned public artifacts to focus on synthetic samples, mind-map screenshots, and case-study notes.

Documentation:

• Link to an external NotionNext public case-study overview from the README portfolio section.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

README for the trans-video project is updated to be a public-safe portfolio landing page, adding a NotionNext case-study link, a generalized workflow/architecture description (including a Mermaid diagram), and tightening language around public/private boundaries and planned artifacts.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Reframe the README introduction and project description as a generalized AI media/knowledge automation workflow rather than a specific private service workspace.	Update the main tagline to describe an AI media and knowledge automation workflow. Rewrite the repository description to emphasize public-safe architecture and that implementation/operations remain private. Rename the "What The Project Does" section to portfolio-oriented wording and describe the workflow at a higher, reusable level.	README.md
Replace private workspace and repository status details with a high-level workflow and architecture description, including stages and a Mermaid diagram.	Remove the table listing public and private repositories and roles. Add a new table outlining ingestion, extraction, AI structuring, mind-map output, document sync, and orchestration stages. Introduce a Mermaid flowchart diagram that visualizes the input-to-review workflow and feedback loop.	README.md
Align interview/portfolio positioning and public boundary text with a sanitized, public-safe narrative.	Adjust interview/portfolio bullets to cover media and knowledge tasks and queue-oriented processing while keeping implementation details abstract. Rewrite the public boundary section to describe the repository as a sanitized case-study pointer and enumerate what is intentionally not published in generalized terms. Tighten language around future demos to require synthetic or explicitly publishable material.	README.md
Update the list of planned public artifacts and add the NotionNext portfolio/case-study link.	Insert a public case-study overview URL pointing to the NotionNext article. Revise the "Next Public Artifacts" list to focus on synthetic samples, mind-map screenshots, and public-safe case-study notes tied to the portfolio overview. Remove references to specific private repos, internal paths, and detailed deployment artifacts from the planned materials section.	README.md

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

• Consider briefly clarifying what “Document sync” entails (e.g., target systems or sync strategies) to make the workflow stage more concrete for readers.
• The public case-study overview URL uses a nonstandard port; consider noting why or switching to a more conventional public URL to reduce friction for portfolio reviewers.

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- Consider briefly clarifying what “Document sync” entails (e.g., target systems or sync strategies) to make the workflow stage more concrete for readers.
- The public case-study overview URL uses a nonstandard port; consider noting why or switching to a more conventional public URL to reduce friction for portfolio reviewers.

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}