Skip to content

Sync Kaizen shared skills - #37

Merged
s-hiraoku merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/sync-kaizen-shared-skills
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

Sync Kaizen shared skills#37
s-hiraoku merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/sync-kaizen-shared-skills

Conversation

@s-hiraoku

@s-hiraoku s-hiraoku commented Jul 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Sync shared Kaizen Agents skills from kaizen-agents-org/.github.
  • Keep issue-linked PR and bug-routing workflows available in this repository.

Verification

  • Automated sync copied the shared skill directories.

Generated by the shared-skill sync workflow.

Closes kaizen-agents-org/.github#149

Closes kaizen-agents-org/.github#147

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@s-hiraoku, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 1 minute

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d51990b3-dbae-428a-b895-b2ca41f9c7b8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a791fa4 and 7102c52.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • skills/pr-guardian/SKILL.md
  • skills/pr-guardian/references/pr-feedback-audit.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/sync-kaizen-shared-skills

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a95a8b713d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread skills/pr-guardian/references/pr-feedback-audit.md
@s-hiraoku
s-hiraoku force-pushed the codex/sync-kaizen-shared-skills branch from a95a8b7 to d7defaf Compare July 18, 2026 02:27
@s-hiraoku

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@s-hiraoku

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PR Guardian pass 1/5 update

  • Pinned head: ef5f059; current CI run 29627352254 completed successfully; required validate passes.
  • Fix pushed: check-run and annotation auditing now uses headRepository.nameWithOwner, so fork PR checks are not silently missed; unavailable head repositories fail the audit incomplete.
  • Codex feedback: replied with validation evidence and resolved the original thread. Thread-aware GraphQL now reports 0 unresolved threads, including outdated threads.
  • Validation: repository CI shell checks, YAML parsing, README checks, and git diff --check.
  • Annotation: one non-blocking Node 20 action-runtime deprecation warning in .github, unrelated to this PR.
  • Current state: pending external review. CodeRabbit rate-limited the actual current-head review, and the latest Codex review targets older head a95a8b7; a current-head Codex review has been requested.

No merge was performed.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ef5f05968e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread skills/pr-guardian/references/pr-feedback-audit.md Outdated
@s-hiraoku

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@s-hiraoku

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PR Guardian pass 2/5 update

  • New Codex P2 feedback was fixed in 7102c52: fork audits query both base and head repositories, retain check-run ownership for annotation lookup, deduplicate run IDs, and fail incomplete on repository query errors.
  • Replied in the original thread and resolved it; current unresolved-thread count is 0.
  • Validation: repository Ruby YAML validation, README checks, git diff --check; watched CI run 29627667607 passed.
  • Current state: pending external review; current-head Codex review requested again, and CodeRabbit actual review remains rate-limited.

No merge was performed.

@s-hiraoku
s-hiraoku merged commit 565a989 into main Jul 18, 2026
2 checks passed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍

Reviewed commit: 7102c52bfd

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@s-hiraoku

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make pr-guardian close actionable review-thread merge gates [monitor] Reconcile kaizen-loop dogfood safety config drift

2 participants