Skip to content

Editorial: fix obsolete RFC reference and terminology#4

Merged
clemensv merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
editorial/fix-rfc-reference-and-terminology
Jun 8, 2026
Merged

Editorial: fix obsolete RFC reference and terminology#4
clemensv merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
editorial/fix-rfc-reference-and-terminology

Conversation

@clemensv
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@clemensv clemensv commented Jun 8, 2026

  • Update RFC4646 to RFC5646 (BCP 47) in references block
  • Use correct term 'language tag' instead of 'language code' in symbols section
  • Broaden abstract opening (extension covers symbols and currencies, not just scientific units)

Fixes #3

- Update RFC4646 to RFC5646 (BCP 47) in references block
- Use correct term 'language tag' instead of 'language code' in symbols section
- Broaden abstract opening (extension covers symbols/currencies too)

Fixes #3

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@clemensv clemensv merged commit 5f9f063 into main Jun 8, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Editorial: obsolete RFC reference, terminology, abstract scope

1 participant