docs(rfc): flip RFCs 0040, 0041, 0042 to accepted — maintainer sign-off - #663
Conversation
Batch maintainer flip (2026-07-28). None of the three touches a benchmarks.md §7 pillar, so validated is vacuous (RFC 0008 precedent) and green was each RFC's last verification stage. RFC 0041's .5 recorded deferral survives acceptance and tracks in the plugin repository. Roadmap ladder rows + open-items bullet updated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qtny6z6cA74xPZa4qRhk4F Signed-off-by: Jens Holdgaard Pedersen <Jens@holdgaard.org>
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 52 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughRFC 0040, RFC 0041, and RFC 0042 are marked accepted with sign-off details, and the roadmap is updated to reflect their terminal acceptance on 2026-07-28. ChangesRFC acceptance documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates RFC documentation to reflect maintainer sign-off by flipping RFC 0040/0041/0042 from green to terminal accepted, and aligns the project roadmap accordingly.
Changes:
- Flip RFC 0040, RFC 0041, and RFC 0042 frontmatter
status:fields toacceptedand addacceptedstatus banners. - Update
docs/roadmap.mdladder rows for RFCs 0040–0042 toaccepted(terminal) and close the “RFC 0040 → accepted” open item.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/roadmap.md | Marks RFC 0040/0041/0042 as accepted (terminal) in the roadmap and updates open items accordingly. |
| docs/rfcs/0040-datafusion-operator-instrumentation.md | Flips RFC 0040 to accepted and records an accepted status banner. |
| docs/rfcs/0041-dashboard-datasource-plugins.md | Flips RFC 0041 to accepted and records an accepted status banner (preserving the recorded deferral note). |
| docs/rfcs/0042-typed-numeric-promotion.md | Flips RFC 0042 to accepted and records an accepted status banner referencing the live verification. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/rfcs/0040-datafusion-operator-instrumentation.md`:
- Line 4: Correct the premature July 28 acceptance dates and statuses across
docs/rfcs/0040-datafusion-operator-instrumentation.md (lines 4-4 and 14-19),
docs/rfcs/0041-dashboard-datasource-plugins.md (lines 4-20),
docs/rfcs/0042-typed-numeric-promotion.md (lines 4-4 and 14-17), and
docs/roadmap.md (lines 219-221 and 283-284). Use the actual sign-off date
consistently in RFC frontmatter, acceptance text, and roadmap completion notes,
or retain the pre-acceptance state until the flip is complete.
In `@docs/roadmap.md`:
- Around line 219-221: Complete the roadmap synchronization in
docs/roadmap.md:219-221 by updating the RFC 0040 downstream crate description
from “green” to its current accepted/terminal status, and in
docs/roadmap.md:283-284 update the RFC 0041 open-work bullet to remove its
“green” wording while retaining the RFC0041.5 deferral.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 8b62b97d-168d-44a8-a77c-8b9bf4f45136
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
docs/rfcs/0040-datafusion-operator-instrumentation.mddocs/rfcs/0041-dashboard-datasource-plugins.mddocs/rfcs/0042-typed-numeric-promotion.mddocs/roadmap.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qtny6z6cA74xPZa4qRhk4F Signed-off-by: Jens Holdgaard Pedersen <Jens@holdgaard.org>
Summary
Batch maintainer flip (2026-07-28): RFC 0040 (DataFusion operator instrumentation), RFC 0041 (dashboard datasource plugins), and RFC 0042 (typed numeric promotion) all move
green→accepted(terminal).benchmarks.md§7 pillar, sovalidatedis vacuous — the RFC 0008 precedent — andgreenwas each RFC's last verification stage.lateste2e leg + wire-levelsumland inourios-perses-pluginwhen the next server release ships typed columns, tracked there rather than by reopening the RFC.acceptedTERMINAL; the "RFC 0040 → accepted" open-items bullet is closed.Maintainer authorization: this session, 2026-07-28 ("lets do 1 and 2" — item 1 being these flips).
Verification
mdbook buildclean. Docs-only; frontmatterstatus:fields flipped together with the banners (the #662 lesson).🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qtny6z6cA74xPZa4qRhk4F
Summary by CodeRabbit