fix(privacy): close historical evidence exemptions - #77
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Remove whole-file privacy exemptions for historical documents and preserve historical provenance using public-safe evidence instead.
Why
A dated filename is not an authority boundary. Historical records in this repository also contain current-state notes, routing instructions, recommendations, commands, and later operational addenda.
Historical provenance should preserve the claim, not create a whole-file privacy bypass.
Validation
scripts/validate-repo.sh: PASS.git diff --check: PASS.External / optional checks
The operator-owned private-dictionary lane was not configured and therefore is not claimed as having run.
Scope
This PR does not: