Skip to content

duty_cycle bug fixed - #1

Open
vnmtwo wants to merge 1 commit into
jdimpson:masterfrom
vnmtwo:fix-duty_cycle
Open

duty_cycle bug fixed#1
vnmtwo wants to merge 1 commit into
jdimpson:masterfrom
vnmtwo:fix-duty_cycle

Conversation

@vnmtwo

@vnmtwo vnmtwo commented Feb 19, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

fixed duty-cycle bug: you cant set frequency, if old duty-cycle value is not valid for new frequency

changed duty-cycle logic: now duty cycle in range in float 0.0 .. 1.0 and recalculates, depending of the frequency

class attributes are private now

the sysPWM class has constructor with frequency argument. I could not find a case, when I need an instance without frequency.

fixed duty-cycle bug: you cant set frequency, if old duty-cycle value is not valid for new frequency

changed duty-cycle logic: now duty cycle in range in float 0.0 .. 1.0 and recalculates, depending of the frequency

class attributes are private now

the sysPWM class has constructor with  frequency argument. I could not find a case, when I need an instance without frequency.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant