(MOT-4366) Publish worker license metadata - #724
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
skill-check — worker0 verified, 54 skipped (no docs/).
Four for four. Nicely done. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 6 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (56)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe change makes ChangesWorker license metadata
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 2📝 Generate docstrings 💡
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/sops/new-worker.md`:
- Around line 47-52: Update the publish manifest validation in
validate_worker.py to validate license values as non-empty, valid SPDX
identifiers or expressions before publishing workers. Preserve the existing
string, trimming, and 128-character checks, and reject any license that fails
SPDX validation consistently with the requirements documented in new-worker.md.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: bc19fd40-5e0b-4c9a-a1d3-c6f098e2c67a
📒 Files selected for processing (59)
.github/scripts/build_publish_payload.py.github/scripts/tests/test_build_publish_payload.py.github/scripts/tests/test_validate_worker.py.github/scripts/validate_worker.pyacp/iii.worker.yamlapproval-gate/iii.worker.yamlbridge/iii.worker.yamlbrowser/iii.worker.yamlclaude-code/iii.worker.yamlcodex/iii.worker.yamlcomputer/iii.worker.yamlconsole/iii.worker.yamlcontext-manager/iii.worker.yamlcron/iii.worker.yamldatabase/iii.worker.yamldevin/iii.worker.yamldocs/sops/new-worker.mdeditor/iii.worker.yamlemail/iii.worker.yamleval/iii.worker.yamlfp/iii.worker.yamlgithub/iii.worker.yamlgrok/iii.worker.yamlharness/iii.worker.yamlhermes/iii.worker.yamlhttp/iii.worker.yamliii-directory/iii.worker.yamlimage-resize/iii.worker.yamlllm-router/iii.worker.yamllsp/iii.worker.yamlmcp/iii.worker.yamlmemory-consolidate/iii.worker.yamlmemory/iii.worker.yamlopencode/iii.worker.yamlopenwiki/iii.worker.yamlpdf/iii.worker.yamlpi/iii.worker.yamlprovider-anthropic/iii.worker.yamlprovider-claude-code/iii.worker.yamlprovider-deepseek/iii.worker.yamlprovider-kimi/iii.worker.yamlprovider-llamacpp/iii.worker.yamlprovider-openai-codex/iii.worker.yamlprovider-openai/iii.worker.yamlprovider-xai/iii.worker.yamlprovider-zai/iii.worker.yamlpubsub/iii.worker.yamlqueue/iii.worker.yamlrbac-proxy/iii.worker.yamlscrapling/iii.worker.yamlsession-manager/iii.worker.yamlshell/iii.worker.yamlslack/iii.worker.yamlstate/iii.worker.yamlstorage/iii.worker.yamltelegram-bot/iii.worker.yamlweb/iii.worker.yamlworkflow/iii.worker.yamlworktree/iii.worker.yaml
8c0c1f1 to
7a6f0c1
Compare
7a6f0c1 to
3da679a
Compare
1 participant
Summary
license: Apache-2.0to all 54 regular worker manifestsWhy
The repository license already covers these workers, but published registry metadata did not expose it. This gives the registry a reliable SPDX value to display as metadata and a label.
Dependencies
Test plan
222 passedacross.github/scripts/tests.github/scripts/validate_worker.py