perf(demo): reach the first tool call sooner - #658
Conversation
The prompt is preamble; the run is what the reader came for. Type it at 18ms/char instead of 42, and stream the opening thought on a 1.1s budget instead of a per-token cadence that stretched it past 2s. Measured on the built demo: prompt typed at 1.67s, the opening thought streams in 1.09s, and engine::workers::list is on screen at 5.18s. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
skill-check — worker0 verified, 51 skipped (no docs/).
Four for four. Nicely done. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 32 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe demo now calculates opening-thought streaming pace for a 1.1-second duration and types prompts at a shorter per-character interval. ChangesDemo timing
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
The close button was ink on cream, indistinguishable from pause and replay beside it. Alert red now, with black rather than cream text on it: at 10px the label needs the contrast (7.8:1 against the red, versus 4.0:1 for white). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Picks up iii-hq/workers#658: the close control in the embedded console's window chrome is alert red on black, so the way out is the loudest thing in the frame. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Raw #ff0026 read as an error rather than as the way out. Mixed 72% with a near-black in oklab it lands on #b8071f, which stays the loudest thing in the chrome bar while letting white hold 6.8:1 at the 10px the bar uses. Derived from the alert token and identical in both themes, since the control means the same thing in each. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Picks up iii-hq/workers#658: the close control sits at #b8071f instead of raw alert red, still the loudest thing in the window chrome. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The landing demo spent over two seconds typing the prompt and another two on
the opening thought before anything happened. Both are preamble; the run is
what the reader came for.
paceOver(body, totalMs)helper, instead of a per-token cadence whoselength decided the duration.
Measured on the built demo, from page load: prompt fully typed at 1.6s, the
opening thought streams in 1.09s,
engine::workers::liston screen at 5.1s.The website vendors this build, so it ships alongside
iii-hq/iii#2029 there.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit