Prepare README for international critical testing

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/installation_problem.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+name: Installation problem
+description: Report a reproducible installation, loading, or skill-discovery problem.
+title: "[Installation]: "
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        Do not include unpublished manuscripts, API keys, private paths, personal data, or other secrets. Replace local usernames and directories with neutral placeholders.
+  - type: input
+    id: version
+    attributes:
+      label: Humanities Superpowers version or commit
+      placeholder: e.g., v1.0.0 or commit SHA
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: harness
+    attributes:
+      label: Agent harness
+      options:
+        - Claude Code
+        - OpenAI Codex
+        - Cursor
+        - Manual Markdown use
+        - Other
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: input
+    id: os
+    attributes:
+      label: Operating system
+      placeholder: e.g., Windows 11, macOS 15, Ubuntu 24.04
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: layout
+    attributes:
+      label: Installation layout
+      description: Show the relevant folder structure with private path segments removed.
+      render: shell
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: expected
+    attributes:
+      label: Expected behavior
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: actual
+    attributes:
+      label: Actual behavior or error message
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: reproduce
+    attributes:
+      label: Minimal reproduction steps
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: checks
+    attributes:
+      label: Validation commands already run
+      placeholder: python3 scripts/validate_repository.py
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: privacy
+    attributes:
+      label: Public-report check
+      options:
+        - label: I have removed secrets, private paths, personal data, and unpublished research material.
+          required: true

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/methodological_criticism.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+name: Methodological criticism
+description: Identify a conceptual, disciplinary, or methodological weakness in the framework.
+title: "[Methodological criticism]: "
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        Strong criticism is welcome. Please focus on claims, procedures, evidence standards, and disciplinary assumptions rather than persons.
+  - type: input
+    id: discipline
+    attributes:
+      label: Discipline or methodological perspective
+      placeholder: e.g., archival history, textual scholarship, philosophy, postcolonial studies
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: target
+    attributes:
+      label: Main target of criticism
+      options:
+        - A specific research skill
+        - Quality gates
+        - Router or rollback logic
+        - Human-AI responsibility model
+        - Documentation or terminology
+        - Framework as a whole
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: input
+    id: target_name
+    attributes:
+      label: Specific file, skill, or claim
+      placeholder: e.g., performing-close-reading or PASS criteria
+  - type: textarea
+    id: criticism
+    attributes:
+      label: Methodological criticism
+      description: State the problem as precisely as possible.
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: risk
+    attributes:
+      label: Scholarly risk created by this problem
+      description: Explain what the framework may distort, exclude, oversimplify, or falsely stabilize.
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: counterexample
+    attributes:
+      label: Counterexample, alternative method, or proposed revision
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: privacy
+    attributes:
+      label: Public-report check
+      options:
+        - label: I have removed confidential, personal, unpublished, and copyrighted material from this report.
+          required: true

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/test_report.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+name: Test report
+description: Report what happened when you tested one Humanities Superpowers skill on a real research project.
+title: "[Test report]: "
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        Thank you for critically testing Humanities Superpowers. Do not include unpublished manuscripts, personal data, reviewer identities, or copyrighted source text. Use anonymized descriptions and minimal excerpts.
+  - type: input
+    id: discipline
+    attributes:
+      label: Discipline or research area
+      placeholder: e.g., literary studies, history, philosophy, digital humanities
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: input
+    id: skill
+    attributes:
+      label: Skill tested
+      placeholder: e.g., auditing-citations
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: harness
+    attributes:
+      label: Agent harness
+      options:
+        - Claude Code
+        - OpenAI Codex
+        - Cursor
+        - Manual Markdown use
+        - Other
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: context
+    attributes:
+      label: Research context and task
+      description: Describe the task without sharing confidential or copyrighted material.
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: outcome
+    attributes:
+      label: What happened
+      description: Report the route, gate result, useful behavior, and failure or friction you observed.
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: weakness
+    attributes:
+      label: Where was the framework too rigid, too technical, or methodologically weak?
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: improvement
+    attributes:
+      label: Suggested improvement or counterexample
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: privacy
+    attributes:
+      label: Public-report check
+      options:
+        - label: I have removed confidential, personal, unpublished, and copyrighted material from this report.
+          required: true