Adding truth info for FCC-ee ILD model, add vertex resolutions as inp… - #188
Adding truth info for FCC-ee ILD model, add vertex resolutions as inp…#188armin-ilg wants to merge 7 commits into
Conversation
…ut arguments, update vertex detector naming scheme to be compliant also with FCC-SEED VXD (backwards compatible with CLD VXD), updating CT_MAX_DIST value to use the same as CLD with smaller beam pipe
|
@Victor-Schwan : As discussed, here's the PR with the changes to ILDConfig |
|
I have just realized that I have already a ILDConfig/StandardConfig/production/HighLevelReco/HighLevelReco.py Lines 206 to 262 in 279b180 ILDReconstruction.py. This is also already present in my fork. I guess it may make more sense to take the MCRecoTruthLinker from my fork?
|
Co-authored-by: Victor Schwan <162138084+Victor-Schwan@users.noreply.github.com>
Okay, yes that makes totally sense. Shall I remove the truth link stuff from this PR? |
In my opinion, that makes the most sense. If you need it, just |
|
So for clarification: This PR will introduce the vertex resolution setting bits and #193 will do the truth linking? |
There are many things in #193 that are necessary for FCC tracking. I've created a draft PR so that others can see it and, for example, to avoid implementing TruthLinking twice. However, it might make sense to merge TruthLinking beforehand in a separate PR. Let me know if you wish to do so |
That sounds like a good idea |
I removed the truth linking from this PR 👍 |
|
All comments addressed now |
Co-authored-by: Thomas Madlener <thomas.madlener@desy.de>
|
CI seems to be as happy as we expect it to be. @Victor-Schwan any preference from your side on the order of merging things? |
|
I have resolved the conflicts via a merge. Can you give this a quick look again when you have time to make sure that didn't do anything unexpected? |
|
This looks good, but we would like to defer merging this until we have established the technical bits of running performance studies that @Victor-Schwan is currently working on. Otherwise we run the danger of introducing yet another source of potential issues (even though nothing in here looks like it should be one). In light of ILD being removed again from the switch to the SEED VXD in key4hep/k4geo#612, do you need this to be merged to master immediately @armin-ilg? Otherwise, we would merge this once the technical baseline is established and I will keep this PR mergeable, resp. fix merge conflicts as they arise so that you can effectively consider this PR as done from your side. |
No, I don't think we need to have this merged instantly, I'd be happy to wait. |
…ut arguments, update vertex detector naming scheme to be compliant also with FCC-SEED VXD (backwards compatible with CLD VXD), updating CT_MAX_DIST value to use the same as CLD with smaller beam pipe
BEGINRELEASENOTES
CT_MAX_DISTto correct value (like in CLD)ENDRELEASENOTES