Restore the checked web application framework - #33
Merged
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedToo many files! This PR contains 114 files, which is 14 over the limit of 100. To get a review, narrow the scope: Upgrade to a paid plan to raise the limit. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (116)
You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
softmarshmallow
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 22, 2026 16:40
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Restores Uhura's web application meta-framework on top of the 0.4 machine-first language, without adding a compatibility frontend.
[framework]web-appprofile and one shared project resolverApplicationmodulesCloses #27.
Why
The 0.4 machine rewrite deliberately focused on the kernel and left the previous filesystem application topology behind. Application structure consequently lived in one large authored module, while the CLI and host retained overlapping ideas about project discovery.
This change restores application ergonomics as a checked compilation layer. Authored files remain modular and human-facing; the runtime still receives one deterministic, globally checked program.
Contract
A framework project opts in explicitly:
The first version deliberately excludes layouts, slots, loaders, component-local state, lifecycle hooks, and a second scheduler. Pure UI components use typed props and emitted events; application state and transitions remain machine-owned.
Validation
cargo fmt --all -- --checkcargo clippy --locked --workspace --all-targets -- -D warningscargo test --locked --workspace --all-targetscorepack pnpm@10.11.0 -C web check— 283 passed, 2 skippedbash scripts/build-wasm.shThe Spock integration check continues to report its existing intentional warning for the unchecked provider adapter.