Skip to content

Clay (ryan-chang-33dcc0): Kimi K2.6 rate-limit investigation - #7

Draft
tarunipaleru wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/kimi-k2p6-rate-limiting-faf2
Draft

Clay (ryan-chang-33dcc0): Kimi K2.6 rate-limit investigation#7
tarunipaleru wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/kimi-k2p6-rate-limiting-faf2

Conversation

@tarunipaleru

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Prometheus investigation of why account ryan-chang-33dcc0 (Clay) saw rate limits in the last 24h despite not appearing to hit TPM ceilings on dashboards.

Verdict

Clay was rate-limited on kimi-k2p6, but not from sitting at adaptive TPM ceilings.

  • 62 HTTP 429s with rejection_reason=tokens_prompt on deployment kimi-k2p6
  • Concentrated at 2026-08-05 01:21–01:23 UTC (8 + 39 + 15)
  • Coincides with a sharp ramp: ~25 → ~349 req/min in ~6 minutes
  • Adaptive prompt / cache-adjusted / generated limits were mid-raise; cache-adjusted prompt limit was already at upper bound

Smoothed utilization vs global RLM limits stayed low (peak ~41% generated, ~13% prompt, ~11–14% cache-adjusted), which is why dashboards look “under limit.” The tokens_prompt rate mirror was also missing/0 during the exact 429 window, so that dimension’s utilization is not visible at rejection time.

Artifacts

  • ryan-chang-33dcc0-rate-limit-investigation.md — full write-up + PromQL
  • Supporting kimi-k2p6 harness/report files from an earlier exploratory pass are also on the branch; the investigation doc is the primary deliverable.
Open in Web Open in Cursor 

cursoragent and others added 2 commits August 5, 2026 17:30
Characterize adaptive TPM headers and 429 behavior for
accounts/fireworks/models/kimi-k2p6 across phased, stress,
and burst test scenarios.

Co-authored-by: tarunipaleru <tarunipaleru@users.noreply.github.com>
Prometheus shows 62 kimi-k2p6 HTTP 429s with rejection_reason=tokens_prompt
during a sharp ramp at 2026-08-05 01:21-01:23 UTC, despite smoothed TPM
utilization staying well below adaptive ceilings.

Co-authored-by: tarunipaleru <tarunipaleru@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants