Skip to content

feat: add partitioned#261

Merged
mcollina merged 10 commits into
fastify:masterfrom
gurgunday:add-part
Nov 15, 2023
Merged

feat: add partitioned#261
mcollina merged 10 commits into
fastify:masterfrom
gurgunday:add-part

Conversation

@gurgunday

@gurgunday gurgunday commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Adds support for the non-standard Partitioned option

It was added to jshttp/cookie a few days ago

@gurgunday gurgunday requested a review from a team November 8, 2023 19:54

@jsumners jsumners left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am against adding things that do not conform to the spec.

@Uzlopak

Uzlopak commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We have to add it.

@gurgunday

gurgunday commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I am against adding things that do not conform to the spec.

I fully agree personally 😄

One of the reasons @mcollina forked cookie was to add this though

Users seem to want it

@jsumners

jsumners commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We have to add it.

Why? Is it at least defined in a draft?

@climba03003

climba03003 commented Nov 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

After some investigation,

Why?

Chrome started to ban / phase out third-party cookies. It can only be used with the new Partitioned attribute.
https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/third-party-cookie-phase-out/

Is it at least defined in a draft?

The Partitioned attribute is promoted by an individual draft.
Github: https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS
DataTracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cutler-httpbis-partitioned-cookies#section-2.1

For my personal opinion, it seems only Google have the interest on this individual draft.
Neither Mozilla nor Apple Webkit is going to implement it in foreseeable future.
Mozilla and Apple Webkit are positive to the proposal, but still requesting some improvement or discussion before implementing the feature. We do not have a solid road map on when it would be implemented.
mozilla/standards-positions#678
WebKit/standards-positions#50

If we need to provide this option, I would mark it as Experimental because we don't know if it going to be a real standard (based on the Browser vendor interest.).

Edit(2023-11-15): update the Mozilla and Webkit position on the proposal.

@Eomm Eomm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would write in the reademe [experimental] with a reference to the @climba03003 's comment 🔝

Comment thread cookie.js
Comment thread cookie.js
Co-authored-by: James Sumners <321201+jsumners@users.noreply.github.com>

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@marco-ippolito

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

not blocking, but I strongly think it should be marked as experimental

@gurgunday

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Agreed, will do that

Comment thread README.md Outdated
@gurgunday

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Well, now I want to change parseOptions to serializationOptions because it actually seems to do nothing to change parsing behavior

@gurgunday gurgunday requested a review from a team November 12, 2023 01:45
This reverts commit ad49da2.

@Uzlopak Uzlopak left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RSLGTM

Comment thread README.md Outdated
Comment thread README.md Outdated
gurgunday and others added 2 commits November 12, 2023 14:37
Co-authored-by: Manuel Spigolon <behemoth89@gmail.com>
@Fdawgs

Fdawgs commented Nov 14, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Neither Mozilla nor Apple Webkit is going to implement it in foreseeable future.

They support the effort though:

@gurgunday

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Oh that's useful 🙏

@climba03003

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

They support the effort though

Good to know that, I have updated my comment to reflect the vendor interest.

@fox1t

fox1t commented Nov 15, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

@gurgunday

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Let me add a mention to @climba03003's comment, which sums it up nicely

@mcollina mcollina merged commit 9e4652f into fastify:master Nov 15, 2023
@gurgunday gurgunday deleted the add-part branch November 15, 2023 16:43
renovate Bot referenced this pull request in specfy/specfy Nov 22, 2023
[![Mend Renovate logo
banner](https://app.renovatebot.com/images/banner.svg)](https://renovatebot.com)

This PR contains the following updates:

| Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [@fastify/cookie](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie) |
[`9.0.4` ->
`9.2.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@fastify%2fcookie/9.0.4/9.2.0)
|
[![age](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/age/npm/@fastify%2fcookie/9.2.0?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|
[![adoption](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/adoption/npm/@fastify%2fcookie/9.2.0?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|
[![passing](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/compatibility/npm/@fastify%2fcookie/9.0.4/9.2.0?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|
[![confidence](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/confidence/npm/@fastify%2fcookie/9.0.4/9.2.0?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|

---

### Release Notes

<details>
<summary>fastify/fastify-cookie (@&#8203;fastify/cookie)</summary>

###
[`v9.2.0`](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/releases/tag/v9.2.0)

[Compare
Source](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/compare/v9.1.0...v9.2.0)

#### What's Changed

- chore: add `.gitattributes` file by
[@&#8203;Fdawgs](https://togithub.com/Fdawgs) in
[https://github.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/255](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/255)
- refactor(signer): add `u` unicode flag to regex by
[@&#8203;Fdawgs](https://togithub.com/Fdawgs) in
[https://github.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/256](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/256)
- chore(deps-dev): bump sinon from 16.1.3 to 17.0.0 by
[@&#8203;dependabot](https://togithub.com/dependabot) in
[https://github.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/257](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/257)
- chore(package): explicitly declare js module type by
[@&#8203;Fdawgs](https://togithub.com/Fdawgs) in
[https://github.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/258](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/258)
- refactor(plugin): replace `typeof` undefined check by
[@&#8203;Fdawgs](https://togithub.com/Fdawgs) in
[https://github.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/259](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/259)
- Go back to use our own cookie implementation by
[@&#8203;mcollina](https://togithub.com/mcollina) in
[https://github.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/260](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/260)
- feat: add partitioned by
[@&#8203;gurgunday](https://togithub.com/gurgunday) in
[https://github.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/261](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/261)

**Full Changelog**:
fastify/fastify-cookie@v9.1.0...v9.2.0

###
[`v9.1.0`](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/releases/tag/v9.1.0)

[Compare
Source](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/compare/v9.0.4...v9.1.0)

#### What's Changed

- perf: don't initialize req.cookies before checking the header by
[@&#8203;gurgunday](https://togithub.com/gurgunday) in
[https://github.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/248](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/248)
- chore(deps-dev): bump tsd from 0.28.1 to 0.29.0 by
[@&#8203;dependabot](https://togithub.com/dependabot) in
[https://github.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/249](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/249)
- perf: use `node:` prefix for builtins by
[@&#8203;gurgunday](https://togithub.com/gurgunday) in
[https://github.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/250](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/250)
- chore(deps-dev): bump sinon from 15.2.0 to 16.0.0 by
[@&#8203;dependabot](https://togithub.com/dependabot) in
[https://github.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/252](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/252)
- use named exports by
[@&#8203;gurgunday](https://togithub.com/gurgunday) in
[https://github.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/254](https://togithub.com/fastify/fastify-cookie/pull/254)

**Full Changelog**:
fastify/fastify-cookie@v9.0.4...v9.1.0

</details>

---

### Configuration

📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - "after 4pm every weekday" in timezone
Europe/Paris, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled.

♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the
rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update
again.

---

- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check
this box

---

This PR has been generated by [Mend
Renovate](https://www.mend.io/free-developer-tools/renovate/). View
repository job log
[here](https://developer.mend.io/github/specfy/specfy).

<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNy41OS44IiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiMzcuNTkuOCIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6ImNob3JlL3Jlbm92YXRlQmFzZUJyYW5jaCJ9-->

Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants