Skip to content

task-observer: qa-test updates from 2026-05-11#15

Open
divad12 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
task-observer/qa-test-2026-05-11
Open

task-observer: qa-test updates from 2026-05-11#15
divad12 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
task-observer/qa-test-2026-05-11

Conversation

@divad12
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@divad12 divad12 commented May 11, 2026

Target

skill: .agents/skills/qa-test/SKILL.md

Observations addressed

  • Observation 011 (journology/log.md): Shakedown Fixes Need Persisted-Data Invariant Checks → changed: added "Persisted-Data Invariant Checks" section with guidance to run a focused DB/store check after browser flows that write or generate data
  • Observation 014 (journology/log.md): Shakedown Triage Should Treat Optimistic Flicker As A Bug Class → changed: added "Bug Severity Triage" section ranking interaction timing bugs (flicker, stale cache, revert-then-correct) as highest priority FAILs
  • Observation 018 (journology/log.md): Product Shakedown Needs Realistic Scale And Neglected Surfaces → changed: added "Scale and Coverage" section advising periodic scale scenarios and neglected-surface audits

Generated by Claude Code

From task-observer observations 011, 014, 018 (journology/log.md).
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 777a1accac

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +96 to +99
After completing [scenario], also verify persisted data:
- [Specific check, e.g. "confirm no duplicate clues across legs in the DB"]
- Report FAIL if the invariant is violated even when the UI shows success
```
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Remove DB invariant checks from browser-only subagent prompt

This new instruction asks the QA subagent to verify persisted data invariants in the DB, but this skill defines the subagent as Playwright-only with no source or backend access (see earlier constraints in this same file). As written, the subagent cannot execute these checks, so runs will either silently skip required verification or report unverifiable FAILs, which makes the workflow unreliable for exactly the scenarios this section targets.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants