Update sdoc: 0.4.1 → 0.4.2 (minor)#97
Open
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We've updated a dependency and here is what you need to know:
Additionally, the update changed a few other dependencies as well:
You should probably take a good look at the info here and the test results before merging this pull request, of course.
What changed?
✳️ sdoc (0.4.1 → 0.4.2) · Repo · Changelog
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 57 commits:
Add task for building rails edge docsd'oh need to use 1.8 hash syntaxUse bundler to select rdoc master from git:bomb:Add json to rdoc depsMove rdoc-install to before bundle installAdd rdoc master to allowed failuresMove rake and hoe installation, with other rdoc dependencies to scriptUgh haha, too many gemsMove `:rdoc_master` task to bash script for CI useMerge pull request #93 from krautcomputing/a_instead_of_h1_fixupfix styling and behaviour of search resultsRemove read attribute for `rel_prefix` to try to fix #92Any rake before version 11 should work, and fix a gem install errorInstall rdoc rake dependencies firstThat should be equality check ;)In case of CI this path _wont_ exist and we can ignore having to support legacy path lookupTry testing against rdoc master /cc #80Fix documentation for RDoc::Task and add some more detailRevert more of 06ccf3ebce6b285239e5c9f4d0e10a9e324dc67d to fix buildRevert part of 06ccf3ebce6b285239e5c9f4d0e10a9e324dc67d and add `rel_prefix` readerAdd note for `rdoc_dir` optionRevert part of 5e2eaaac7eabe818924fe210b3bf07b81146f94a which still used ErubisClean up documentation in READMEBump version for upcoming releaseUpdate homepage and email [ci skip]Merge branch 'xuhao' from #65Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/Xuhao/sdoc into xuhaoAdd jruby-19mode back, since we're still testing old rubies for this releaseEnsure latest bundler is usedUse Rake 10 until support for older Rubies is droppedRemove json_pure dependency, just use plain-old jsonMerge branch 'master' of github.com:voloko/sdocMerge branch 'master' of github.com:zzak/sdocAdd Ruby 2.2 and 2.3 to test matrix, update notification email addressJust move development dependencies to Gemfile so bundler will stop complainingRemove development restriction on bundler versionMerge pull request #91 from krautcomputing/a_instead_of_h1Merge pull request #84 from gajon/masterAdd CHANGELOG entry for upcoming stable releaseFix warningsuse <a>s instead of <h1>s in panelMerge pull request #86 from jaredbeck/add_changelog#69 Runtime error fix#69 Gemspec upgradeUse Erubis implement erb tempalte #69#65 part of javascript revertGenerator templates correctionsReview of changes in 0.4.1Formatting [ci skip]Remove jruby-19modeAny 2.1 patch level is ok:scissors:Simple spelling fixes for -s option descriptionMerge pull request #78 from claudiob/add-breakline-on-call-seqAdd <br> between multiple call-seq on a methodUpdate copyrightCommits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.
Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase.