Skip to content

fix: CVE-2026-29111 varlink null element check#38

Open
deepin-ci-robot wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
fix/CVE-2026-29111
Open

fix: CVE-2026-29111 varlink null element check#38
deepin-ci-robot wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
fix/CVE-2026-29111

Conversation

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CVE-2026-29111 修复

漏洞描述

CVE-2026-29111: Local unprivileged user can trigger an assert in systemd

当非特权用户通过 varlink IPC API 发送包含 null 元素的数组/映射数据时,systemd (作为 PID 1) 会触发断言并冻结执行。

修复内容

varlink_idl_validate_field_element_type() 函数中添加 null 检查,优雅地拒绝包含 null 元素的数据,而不是触发断言。

上游修复

测试

  • 补丁可以正确应用和撤销
  • changelog 已更新
  • 仅修改 debian/ 目录

影响范围

  • 修改文件: src/shared/varlink-idl.c (通过 debian 补丁)
  • 新增补丁: debian/patches/fix-CVE-2026-29111-varlink-null-check.patch

Generated by CVE-Fixer

CVE-2026-29111: Local unprivileged user can trigger an assert in systemd

When an unprivileged IPC API call is made with spurious data containing
null elements in arrays/maps, systemd (as PID 1) hits an assert and
freezes execution. This fix adds a null check in
varlink_idl_validate_field_element_type() to gracefully reject such
malformed data instead of triggering an assertion.

Upstream: systemd/systemd@6f30740

Signed-off-by: deepin-ci-robot <packages@deepin.org>
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign goldendeng for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

TAG Bot

TAG: 255.2-4deepin25
EXISTED: no
DISTRIBUTION: unstable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants