Skip to content

feat: Add support model T2258 - RoboVac G20 Hybrid#424

Open
phankhanhpvk wants to merge 1 commit into
damacus:mainfrom
phankhanhpvk:feat/add-support-model-T2258
Open

feat: Add support model T2258 - RoboVac G20 Hybrid#424
phankhanhpvk wants to merge 1 commit into
damacus:mainfrom
phankhanhpvk:feat/add-support-model-T2258

Conversation

@phankhanhpvk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Add support model T2258 - RoboVac G20 Hybrid

@ameer1234567890
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@damacus Please add this.

| T2252 | RoboVac G30 Verge | 3.3 |
| T2253 | RoboVac G30 Hybrid | 3.3 |
| T2254 | RoboVac G20 Hybrid | 3.3 |
| T2258 | RoboVac G20 Hybrid | 3.3 |
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the difference between this and the 2254?

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

T2258 is Eufy RoboVac G20 Hybrid, and T2254 is Eufy RoboVac G40 Hybrid, which supports supports self-empty stations unlike G20 Hybrid.

@damacus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

damacus commented May 9, 2026

Thanks for adding T2258 support.

The registry wiring looks good, but please verify the T2258-specific command values before merge.

The public T2258/G20 Hybrid manual only documents Auto + Spot cleaning modes and Quiet/Standard/Turbo/Max suction levels, while this PR adds SmallRoom/Edge/Nosweep and omits Quiet.

Please either include a real T2258 DPS dump confirming these values or adjust the mapping/tests to the documented T2258 capabilities.

Also please fix the supported-model docs so T2258 is listed as G20 Hybrid without leaving the existing conflicting T2254 G20 Hybrid entry.

@damacus damacus changed the title Add support model T2258 - RoboVac G20 Hybrid feat: Add support model T2258 - RoboVac G20 Hybrid May 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants